The
Washington Post reported last week that Marc Elias, a lawyer for
2016 Democratic presidential candidate Clinton, used campaign
funds to hire Fusion GPS, the firm behind the dossier.
Committees in both chambers of Congress have been investigating
the origin and contents of the document.
John Podesta, who was Clinton's campaign chairman, and U.S.
Representative Debbie Wasserman Schultz, who was the head of the
Democratic National Committee at the time, as well as Elias
“absolutely need to be recalled" to testify," Collins said in an
appearance on CBS' "Face the Nation."
"It’s difficult to imagine that a campaign chairman, that the
head of the DNC would not know of an expenditure of this
magnitude and significance," Collins said. "But perhaps there’s
something more going on here. But certainly, it’s worth
additional questioning of those two witnesses. And the lawyer;
absolutely, he more than anyone.”
It has been widely reported that supporters of Republican Jeb
Bush, a primary opponent of Trump, initially paid for the firm's
research. Perkins Coie, Elias' law firm, confirmed on Tuesday
that it had hired Fusion GPS in April 2016.
The Washington Free Beacon, a conservative online publication
backed by billionaire Republican megadonor Paul Singer, said on
Friday it was the original funder of the Fusion GPS project to
compile opposition research on multiple Republican presidential
candidates, including Trump.
Known as the Steele dossier because it was compiled by former
MI6 officer Christopher Steele, the document identified Russian
businessmen and others who U.S. intelligence analysts have
concluded are Russian intelligence officers or working on behalf
of the Russian government.
Representative Trey Gowdy, a Republican who runs the House
Oversight Committee, said in an appearance on "Fox News Sunday"
that he was more interested in whether the Federal Bureau of
Investigation or the Department of Justice used the dossier in
conducting their own probes.
"I don’t expect the (Democratic National Committee) to be
objective," Gowdy said. "Almost by definition, opposition
research is not objective.
"The next thing that House Intel is trying to find out is
whether or not the U.S. government relied on it."
(Reporting by Ginger Gibson; Editing by Lisa Von Ahn)
[© 2017 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2017 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
|
|