U.S. may need new law to address Russian
ad buys on Facebook: senator
Send a link to a friend
[September 08, 2017]
By Dustin Volz and David Ingram
WASHINGTON/SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) - U.S.
legislation may be needed to require social media companies to disclose
more about how their platforms are used for political advertising, a
senior Democratic lawmaker said on Thursday, after new signs of Russian
efforts to influence the 2016 election.
Facebook Inc said on Wednesday that an operation likely based in Russia
had placed thousands of U.S. ads with polarizing views on topics such as
immigration, race and gay rights on the site during a two-year period
through May 2017.
The world's largest social network was already under fire for how little
transparency it provides about digital political ads. Voters,
researchers and journalists cannot see many of the ads politicians and
interest groups run on Facebook to target certain groups, nor can they
discover who paid for them.
Senator Mark Warner said Congress may need to update laws in order to
make them consistent with rules governing television advertising.
"An American can still figure out what the content is being used in TV
advertising. You can go look at the ad," Warner, of Virginia, said at a
security conference.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/95de8/95de89c05d449ae949fb6e2faff5de2735fd2883" alt=""
"But in social media there is no such requirement. So, you know, we may
need a legislative solution," he said.
A second Democratic senator, Martin Heinrich of New Mexico, said on
Thursday that he supported regulating social media ads like TV ads.
U.S. intelligence agencies say there was an extensive Russian
cyber-influence operation during the 2016 election campaign aimed at
helping Donald Trump, a Republican, defeat Democrat Hillary Clinton.
Russia has repeatedly denied the allegations.
Watchdog group Common Cause on Thursday filed a complaint with the U.S.
Justice Department and the Federal Election Commission alleging that
unknown foreign nationals made expenditures during the election in
violation of American election law.
Warner, the top Democrat on the Senate Intelligence Committee, said he
believed what Facebook disclosed was "the tip of the iceberg" and that
Twitter Inc and other tech companies should also examine the issue.
Twitter declined to comment. Google, the search engine which also owns
video-sharing website YouTube, said on Thursday it had seen no evidence
of an ad campaign like the one Facebook disclosed.
Warner's committee is among those investigating alleged Russian meddling
and whether members of Trump's campaign colluded with Moscow.
Facebook's disclosure about Russian advertising created more questions
than it answered, such as which candidates the ads supported and how
savvy the targeting was, said David Lazer, a Northeastern University
political scientist.
"Does it reflect sophistication and coordination, or did they throw
$100,000 at this just to try a bunch of stuff?" he said.
U.S. election law bars foreign nationals and foreign entities from
spending money to advocate the election or defeat of a candidate,
although non-citizens may advertise on issues. Other ads fall into a
legal gray area.
[to top of second column] |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/36035/36035fb2b24cb208d484f6829304eb78aaeb75ee" alt=""
Senator Mark Warner (D-VA) speaks to reporters ahead of the weekly
party luncheons on Capitol Hill in Washington, U.S., August 1, 2017.
REUTERS/Aaron P. Bernstein
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/098ac/098ac4fdbca7a51ad04d83c2bb5ef1cf64a5cdad" alt=""
NARROW TARGETING
Television has been the backbone of political advertising for
decades, and local U.S. broadcasters are required to disclose a
wealth of details about the cost and schedules of commercials. The
ads can be seen by anyone with a television provided they are aired
in their markets.
Online advertising offered by Facebook and other platforms such as
Twitter and Alphabet Inc's Google, though, often targets narrow,
carefully constructed audiences based on factors such as age,
political preference or interests. Facebook is especially valued by
advertisers due to its targeting capabilities.
Facebook and Google have, so far, declined to make political ads
more transparent. They said on Thursday they were both open to
reviewing specific congressional proposals.
Facebook also said it was continuing its investigation into possible
nefarious activity.
EARLY FACEBOOK DENIAL
Facebook briefed U.S. lawmakers on Wednesday and turned over
information about the ads to Robert Mueller, the special counsel
leading his own investigation into alleged Russian interference, a
source familiar with the matter told Reuters.
Facebook Chief Executive Mark Zuckerberg said after the November
election that it was a "pretty crazy idea" to think false news
stories on the network tilted the election.
Since then, though, the company and other tech firms have taken a
series of steps to address deliberately false stories or
manipulation of traffic by bots. Facebook in April released a report
on "information operations" on the site, including some aimed at
influencing the French election this past spring.
The report on Wednesday expands on that and, for the first time,
shows how paid advertising may have played a role in Russian
influence efforts in the United States.
Much of the advertising on Facebook and Google is self-serve and can
be easily ordered up through their websites.
"You can, from anywhere in the world, advertise to the entire world
through the platform," said Nathan Persily, a Stanford University
law professor. "It's incredibly empowering, but it doesn't have all
the regulatory trappings that a medium like television has."
(Reporting by Dustin Volz in Washington and David Ingram in San
Francisco; Additional reporting by Jonathan Landay in Washington;
Editing by Jonathan Oatis and Andrew Hay)
[© 2017 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
Copyright 2017 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. |