U.S. District Judge William Orrick III of San Francisco earlier
this year ruled that Trump's sanctuary cities order was likely
unconstitutional and stopped it from taking effect.
Trump issued the order in January, shortly after he was
inaugurated, directing that funding be slashed to all
jurisdictions that refuse to comply with a statute that requires
local governments to share information with U.S. immigration
authorities.
Sanctuary cities generally offer safe harbor to illegal
immigrants and often do not use municipal funds or resources to
enforce federal immigration laws.
Dozens of cities and other local governments, including New
York, Los Angeles and Chicago, have joined the growing
"sanctuary" movement.
The Trump administration contends local authorities endanger
public safety when they decline to hand over for deportation
illegal immigrants arrested for crimes.
California's Santa Clara County - which includes the city of San
Jose and several smaller Silicon Valley communities - sued over
Trump's order, saying it was unconstitutional. San Francisco
filed a similar lawsuit. They argued Trump's order could
improperly choke off vast swaths of federal funding for
sanctuary cities.
(Reporting by Dan Levine and Jim Christie in San Francisco;
editing by Grant McCool and Steve Orlofsky)
[© 2017 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2017 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
|
|