| 
					
 
 Sangamon County workers represented 
by the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees have been 
negotiating for a new contract for nearly two years. On Sept. 19, workers took 
to the picket line. 
 
Twyla Moore, president of AFSCME #1936, told Fox Illinois she’s frustrated. 
 
“Two years is a long time to go without a contract or an agreement, and like I 
said we are ready to move forward come to an agreement and be able to wrap 
things up,” she said. 
 
The problem is, it’s not that unusual for government workers to go months – or 
even years – without a contract in Illinois. And Illinois’ labor laws, which 
allow an extensive list of details to be negotiated, are largely to blame. 
 
Look at AFSCME Council 31, which represents state employees. That union has been 
without a contract with the state for over two years. Negotiations between the 
state and the union have stalled, and the parties are litigating the matter in 
the Illinois Appellate Court. 
  Another example: the Chicago Teachers Union. That union’s previous contract 
expired in 2015, but CTU didn’t reach a tentative agreement for a new contract 
with Chicago Public schools until October 2016. And according to information 
obtained by the Illinois Policy Institute via a Freedom of Information Act 
request to CPS, the tentative agreement still hadn’t been finalized as of July 
2017. 
 
A big part of the problem is that government-worker unions are practically 
unlimited in what they can demand in negotiations. And that means negotiations 
over every minute detail can drag on for months or even years. 
 
The Illinois Public Labor Relations Act governs employment relations between 
units of government and government-worker unions. Similarly, the Illinois 
Educational Labor Relations Act governs employment relations between school 
districts and teacher unions. 
 
Both laws allow contract negotiations over wages, hours, and “other conditions 
of employment.” 
 
That’s incredibly broad. And it’s a detriment to both taxpayers and government 
workers who want certainty and efficiency in the contract process. 
 
For taxpayers, it drives up costs. AFSCME Council 31 provides a good example. 
The contract the state wants will make union costs more affordable for 
taxpayers, particularly with regard to healthcare costs. But for each month the 
negotiations drag on – and that contract isn’t in place – Illinois is paying an 
additional $35 million to $40 million on health coverage alone. 
 
[to top of second column]  | 
            
			 
  
			It also inhibits 
			government flexibility, which again affects taxpayers. East Aurora 
			District 131 recently implemented a bus transportation plan that 
			would aide thousands of students in getting to school. But to be 
			most cost effective, the school district wanted to change school 
			start times. Unfortunately, details as minute as school start times 
			are negotiated into teacher contracts and can’t be altered by the 
			school board without negotiating new terms with the teachers union. 
			That means for now, East Aurora can’t adjust those times. And 
			taxpayers are on the hook for thousands of dollars in extra bus 
			costs required to work around the current schedule. 
			 
			There is also an impact on the workers themselves. The fact that 
			just about every subject under the sun can be negotiated brings an 
			element of unpredictability to the labor process. Once negotiations 
			open, workers can’t know how long it will be before a contract is 
			ratified. And as negotiations drag on, talk of going on strike 
			begins. 
			 
			It doesn’t have to be this way. Other states limit what contract 
			subjects can be negotiated. For example, Wisconsin and Iowa limit 
			bargaining with government unions to negotiations over base wages 
			only. Other subjects – like overtime or vacation days – are off the 
			table. 
			 
			But in Illinois, almost everything is up for negotiation. Wages, 
			overtime, holiday pay, vacation time, sick time, leaves of absence, 
			healthcare, time off for union work – to name just a few – are all 
			on the table every time a government worker union contract is up for 
			negotiation. 
			 
			In fact, a municipal employee contract with the City of Kankakee 
			even includes paid time off for employees’ birthdays. 
			 
			When negotiations come to a halt – as they have with AFSCME Council 
			31, which represents Illinois state workers – the negotiators and 
			their demands are not the only problem. 
			
			  
			
			
			  
			Illinois law allows government units and government-worker unions to 
			bargain over too much – and that slows down the process, drives up 
			costs, and undermines the “labor peace” Illinois’ collective 
			bargaining laws were meant to support in the first place. 
			
			
            
			Click here to respond to the editor about this article  |