| 
				 
              
                
				 The study is based on data Michelson collected from 400 farmers 
				over eight years, beginning the year Walmart began buying 
				produce in Nicaragua. The data include when farmers entered a 
				relationship with Walmart and when they dropped out. 
				 
				“We find evidence of what’s known in economics as ‘strategic 
				delay,’ when it looks like people are holding back and waiting 
				to see how an arrangement works out for their neighbor. If 
				things look like they’re going well, they join,” Michelson says. 
				 
				Michelson says the wait-and-see strategy makes a lot of sense 
				and in economic terms it has some implications. 
				 
				“There are some costs for a buyer to begin dealing with a new 
				community. There are search and transportation costs to begin 
				sourcing in a new location, for example. So if a buyer goes 
				through all of that and there’s only one farmer to buy from, 
				that first farmer may have to bear some of those start-up costs 
				on his own,” Michelson says. 
              
                
				  
              
				Michelson says Walmart buyers have strict quality parameters for 
				fruits and vegetables and will only accept the produce that 
				meets those criteria. But as more and more farmers in an area 
				join the supply chain, her analysis finds that the rejection 
				rates for produce go down and the percentage Walmart buys goes 
				up. 
				 
				“We have data from year to year of how much Walmart was buying 
				from each farmer. And we see that as more farmers from a 
				community joined, Walmart winds up buying more and rejecting 
				less from each individual farmer. The buyer comes more 
				frequently and prices get better over time as well. 
				Consequently, the early adopters benefit as more people join, 
				but they’ve had to bear the initial cost of testing out the 
				relationship. To some degree, later adopters free ride on the 
				information provided by those early adopters.” 
				 
				Walmart in Nicaragua is expanding rapidly with over 100 stores. 
				For a country with 6 million people, it has more stores per 
				person than in the United States. According to Michelson, 
				getting the right first adopter could matter a lot. 
              
                “If you think of it from Walmart’s perspective, 
				you want to be really smart about who you establish that initial 
				relationship with,” she says. “When you’re trying to make 
				initial investments or forays into communities with the hope 
				that you’ll develop a robust, broader network of suppliers, then 
				initially selecting the wrong farmer could lead to real 
				challenges.  
              
				[to top of second column]  | 
            
             
              
  
			"If that first farmer enters a relationship with 
			Walmart and has a bad experience, you could have others deciding to 
			stay out of that relationship because they make broader inferences 
			about that relationship based on the perceived outcomes of their 
			neighbor.” 
			 
			In the United States, when new internet providers come into a 
			community, some offer an incentive to early adopters – people who 
			will sign up with a deposit even before it is available to them get 
			the first year at a lower price per month, or some other incentive 
			to join. 
			 
			“If Walmart could establish something similar in Nicaragua, there 
			could be an initial cadre of farmers to learn from,” Michelson says. 
			“One policy implication is that you could provide early adopters 
			with some assistance or incentive because their initial willingness 
			to enter into a relationship with a buyer provides a lot of good 
			opportunities to lots of other people. By subsidizing that initial 
			attempt, farmers could try it out without bearing a lot of private 
			costs. Then, if they try and leave, it might not have significant 
			economic consequences for them.” 
			 
			The study, “Influence of neighbor experience and exit on small 
			farmer market participation,” is published in American Journal of 
			Agricultural Economics. The paper is authored by Hope Michelson. 
			Funding for the work was provided in part by the US Agency for 
			International Development (USAID) Agreement No. EDH-A-00-06-0003-00 
			awarded to the Assets and Market Access Collaborative Research 
			Support Program (AMA CRSP). 
			 
			Hope Michelson is an assistant professor in the Department of 
			Agricultural and Consumer Economics in the College of Agricultural, 
			Consumer and Environmental Sciences at the University of Illinois 
			and a member of the Division of Nutritional Sciences. 
			[Debra Levey Larson 
			University of Illinois 
			College of Agricultural, Consumer and Environmental Sciences] 
			
			  
			
			   |