| 
             
			
			 To see how blood pressure control is influenced by patients checking 
			it themselves at home, researchers examined data from 25 previously 
			published studies that randomly assigned a total of more than 10,000 
			people to either monitor themselves regularly or just stick with 
			usual care including periodic checkups at the doctor. 
			 
			Overall, for people who didn’t get extra support to go along with 
			their home testing, there wasn’t much difference between 
			self-monitoring and sticking with blood pressure checks only at the 
			doctor’s office, the study found. 
			 
			But when home monitoring was paired with extra support or medication 
			adjustments managed by patients based on test results, people 
			achieved significantly lower blood pressure compared to usual care. 
			 
			“If self-monitoring is combined with ongoing tailored interaction 
			with the patient, then this can enable important improvements in 
			blood pressure control, over and above self-monitoring on its own,” 
			said lead study author Dr. Katherine Tucker of the University of 
			Oxford in the UK. 
			
			  
			“Our research shows that increased collaboration between a patient 
			and either their general practitioner, a nurse or a pharmacist in 
			the treatment of hypertension can result in important decreases in 
			blood pressure and improved control necessary to improve a patient’s 
			health,” Tucker said by email. 
			 
			Home blood pressure monitoring is currently recommended for many 
			patients because it can help get more accurate readings than are 
			obtained at the doctor’s office, and it can also assist clinicians 
			in adjusting medication between checkups. 
			 
			While some research suggests home monitoring can help achieve better 
			results than testing only in the exam room, it’s not yet clear who 
			benefits most from this approach or how to make it most effective, 
			researchers note in PLoS Medicine. 
			In adults, a blood pressure reading of 120/80 mmHg (millimeters of 
			mercury) or lower is considered normal or healthy. Pressure readings 
			that are consistently 140/90 mmHg or greater are considered high 
			blood pressure. 
			 
			When researchers looked at the “top number” known as systolic blood 
			pressure (the pressure blood exerts against artery walls when the 
			heart beats), they found home blood pressure checks were associated 
			with average reductions that were 3.2 mmHg larger than with usual 
			care over 12 months. 
			
            [to top of second column]  | 
            
             
  
            
			When self-monitoring wasn’t paired with any additional support, 
			however, it was only linked to an extra 1-mmHg drop in blood 
			pressure compared to usual care – a difference too small to rule out 
			the possibility that it was due to chance. 
			 
			With plenty of extra help tailored to patients’ individual needs, 
			self-monitoring was associated with a blood pressure reduction 6.1 
			mmHg larger than with usual care, the study found. 
			 
			One limitation of the analysis is that the smaller studies included 
			had different methods and varying criteria for selecting 
			participants, which made it difficult to draw broad conclusions from 
			examining the combined results, the authors note. 
			 
			Still, the findings suggest that self-monitoring can play an 
			important role in helping patients get blood pressure under control, 
			said Dr. Costantino Iadecola, director of the Feil Family Brain and 
			Mind Research Institute at Weill Cornell Medical College in New 
			York. 
			 
			For one thing, home testing can help spot variation in blood 
			pressure between checkups, Iadecola, who wasn’t involved in the 
			study, said by email. Readings outside an exam room may also be more 
			accurate for some people who get what’s known as “white coat 
			hypertension,” or stress-related blood pressure spikes during 
			checkups, Iadecola added. 
			 
			Even though a 3-mmHg reduction in blood pressure might not seem that 
			large, if it’s sustained over time for a broad population of people 
			it can translate into a significant decrease in heart disease and 
			deaths, said Dr. Ian Kronish, a researcher at Columbia University 
			Medical Center in New York who wasn’t involved in the study. 
			
			  
			“Taking action at the time of elevated readings provides 
			opportunities for teachable moments in which education and 
			counseling may be more likely to lead to behavior change on the part 
			of the patients,” Kronish said by email. “Similarly, with 
			self-monitoring, clinicians may have more opportunities to take 
			action to get patients’ blood pressure to goal through increased 
			medication.” 
			 
			SOURCE: http://bit.ly/2xM4r9S PLoS Medicine, online September 19, 
			2017. 
			[© 2017 Thomson Reuters. All rights 
				reserved.] Copyright 2017 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, 
			broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.  |