| 
		 
		Company founded by Shkreli off the hook 
		in $43 million lawsuit: judge 
		
		 
		Send a link to a friend  
 
		
		
		 [September 30, 2017] 
		By Brendan Pierson 
		 
		NEW YORK (Reuters) - Vyera Pharmaceuticals, 
		formerly known as Turing Pharmaceuticals, does not have to pay Impax 
		Laboratories Inc $43 million in a dispute stemming from Turing founder 
		Martin Shkreli's decision to boost by 5,000 percent the price of a drug 
		Turing bought from Impax, a U.S. judge ruled on Friday. 
		 
		U.S. District Judge Edgardo Ramos in Manhattan said Vyera was liable for 
		the money under its contract with Impax, but did not have to pay it 
		because Impax had violated the contract as well. 
		 
		Impax and Vyera did not immediately respond to requests for comment. 
		 
		Impax sold Daraprim, an anti-infection drug often used in AIDS patients, 
		to Turing in August 2015. Turing, under Shkreli's leadership, 
		immediately raised its price to $750 per pill, from $13.50, sparking 
		outrage among patients and U.S. lawmakers. 
		 
		Shkreli stepped down as Turing's chief executive officer in December 
		2015 after he was charged with defrauding investors in two hedge funds 
		he once ran. 
		 
		The 34-year-old former executive was convicted of securities fraud in 
		August. He was jailed earlier this month after he placed a $5,000 bounty 
		on former presidential candidate Hillary Clinton's hair, prompting a 
		federal judge to revoke his bail. 
		
		
		  
		
		Shkreli's lawyer, Benjamin Brafman, said at a court hearing in June that 
		Shkreli still owned a substantial share of Turing worth between $30 and 
		$50 million. 
		 
		
            [to top of second column]  | 
            
             
            
			  
			Impax sued Turing in May 2016, claiming that as a result of the 
			price increase, state Medicaid agencies had demanded tens of 
			millions of dollars in rebates for Daraprim pills that still had 
			Impax branding. It said Turing was liable for those rebates. 
			 
			Drug companies must agree to pay such rebates, which are calculated 
			using a formula that depends in part on the manufacturer's price, in 
			order to be eligible for Medicaid coverage. 
			
			
			  
			
			Turing countered that Impax had provided faulty information to the 
			federal health agency that calculated the rebates, and was required 
			to submit corrected information. Impax said it had no obligation to 
			do that under the contract, but Ramos rejected that argument on 
			Friday. 
			 
			The Wall Street Journal reported last week that Impax was in talks 
			to merge with privately held Amneal Pharmaceuticals LLC, citing 
			unnamed sources. 
			 
			(Reporting By Brendan Pierson in New York; Editing by David 
			Gregorio) 
			
			[© 2017 Thomson Reuters. All rights 
			reserved.] 
			Copyright 2017 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, 
			broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.  |