Trump to unveil China tariff list this week, targeting
tech goods
Send a link to a friend
[April 02, 2018]
By David Lawder
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The Trump
administration this week will unveil the list of Chinese imports
targeted for U.S. tariffs to punish Beijing over technology transfer
policies, a move expected to intensify trade tensions between the
world's two largest economies.
The list of $50 billion to $60 billion worth of annual imports is
expected to target "largely high-technology" products and it may be more
than two months before tariffs take effect, administration officials
have said.
The U.S. Trade Representative's office needs to unveil the list of
products by Friday under President Donald Trump's China tariff
proclamation signed on March 22.
The tariffs are aimed at forcing changes to Chinese government policies
that USTR says results in the "uneconomic" transfer of U.S. intellectual
property to Chinese companies.
The agency's "Section 301" investigation authorizing the tariffs alleges
China has systematically sought to misappropriate U.S. intellectual
property through joint venture requirements, unfair technology licensing
rules, purchases of U.S. technology firms with state funding and
outright theft.
China has denied that its laws require technology transfers and has
threatened to retaliate against any U.S. tariffs with trade sanctions of
its own, with potential targets such as U.S. soybeans, aircraft or heavy
equipment.
On Sunday, Beijing slapped extra tariffs of up to 25 percent on 128 U.S.
products including frozen pork, as well as wine and certain fruits and
nuts in response to steep U.S. tariffs on imports of aluminum and steel
announced last month by the Trump administration.
Fears have arisen that the two countries will spiral into a trade war
that will crush global growth.
TARGETING 'MADE IN CHINA 2025'
U.S. technology industry officials said they expected the Trump
administration's list to target products that benefit from Beijing's
"Made in China 2025" program, which aims to upgrade the country's
domestic manufacturing base with more advanced products.
The state-led program targets 10 strategic industries for replacing
imports with Chinese-made products: advanced information technology,
robotics, aircraft, shipbuilding and marine engineering, advanced rail
equipment, new energy vehicles, electrical generation equipment,
agricultural machinery, pharmaceuticals and advanced materials.
[to top of second column] |
U.S. President Donald Trump delivers remarks on the Infrastructure
Initiative at the Local 18 Richfield Training Site in Richfield,
Ohio, U.S., March 29, 2018. REUTERS/Yuri Gripas
"Foreign technology acquisition through various means remains a prime focus
under Made in China 2025 because China is still catching up in many of the areas
prioritized for development," USTR said in its report justifying the tariffs.
U.S. Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer has said that preserving America's
technological edge is "the future of the U.S. economy."
Reports that the tariff list may also include consumer goods such as clothing
and footwear drew strong protests from U.S. business groups, which argued that
it would raise prices for U.S. consumers.
LIMITED TIME FOR TALKS
While there have been contacts between senior members of the Trump
administration and their Chinese counterparts since Trump announced his
intention to impose tariffs, there has been little evidence of intensive
negotiations to forestall them.
"The administration is following the Japan model from the 1980s," said a tech
industry executive. "They'll publish a Federal Register notice of tariffs on
certain products, then try to reach a negotiated settlement over the next 60
days."During his first stint at USTR in the Reagan administration, Lighthizer
employed similar tactics to win voluntary Japanese export restraints on steel
and autos.
Wendy Cutler, a former deputy USTR in charge of Asia negotiations, said that
addressing the sweeping intellectual property allegations identified by USTR
would require major changes to China's industrial policy. A 60-day settlement
may not be realistic in that case.
"I think they've set up a high bar for what they need to achieve, in order not
to impose these types of tariffs and investment restrictions," Cutler said.
(Reporting by David Lawder; Editing by Peter Cooney)
[© 2018 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2018 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |