New York judge awards Nazi-looted
artworks to Holocaust victim's heirs in key test case
Send a link to a friend
[April 06, 2018]
By Steve Gorman
(Reuters) - A New York judge on Thursday
awarded title of two Nazi-looted drawings by noted Austrian painter Egon
Schiele to a Holocaust victim's heirs in what art experts viewed as a
key test case of a U.S. law designed to ease the recovery of such stolen
works.
Under the ruling, both works - "Woman in a Black Pinafore" and "Woman
Hiding her Face" - are to be turned over to descendants of Franz
Friedrich "Fritz" Grunbaum, an Austrian-Jewish entertainer and
impresario who perished in the Dachau concentration camp in 1941.
Grunbaum, a vocal critic of the Nazis, once owned some 450 artworks,
including more than 80 by Schiele, an Expressionist protege of Gustav
Klimt and a major figurative painter of the early 20th century in his
own right.
Grunbaum's art collection was seized by the Nazi regime after he was
arrested in 1938 and sent to Dachau, according to a synopsis of the case
contained in Thursday's summary judgment.
The two Schiele works in question turned up decades later, in a booth
operated by a London-based dealer, Richard Nagy, at a 2015 art and
design show in New York City, and the heirs filed suit seeking to
recover the drawings.
Nagy's lawyers asserted he had acquired legitimate title to the two
drawings, stemming from a 1956 sale of some 50 Schiele works by
Grunbaum's sister-in-law to a gallery in Switzerland, and that the
heirs' rights to bring their claim had long since expired.
In his 17-page decision, however, Justice Charles Ramos of the state
Supreme Court in Manhattan sided against Nagy, citing the Holocaust
Expropriated Art Recovery (HEAR) Act.
[to top of second column]
|
That law, enacted by Congress in 2016, extended the federal statute
of limitations for seeking restitution of Nazi-confiscated art to
six years from the time of "actual discovery" of its identity and
whereabouts.
Nagy's lawyers argued the HEAR Act did not apply, a position the
judge called "absurd," saying the statute was "intended to apply to
cases precisely like this one."
The judge said there was no dispute the artworks at stake formerly
belonged to Grunbaum and were forcibly taken by the Nazis during
World War Two, a fact that put the onus on Nagy to establish a
superior claim. Ramos said no such evidence was presented.
The judge also held that New York law "protects the rightful owner's
property where that property had been stolen, even if the property
is in the possession of a good faith purchaser."
Raymond Dowd, lawyer for the Grunbaum heirs - named in the case as
Timothy Reif, David Frankel and Milos Vavra - hailed the decision as
a landmark in bringing justice to Holocaust victims.
The ruling, he said, "brought us a step closer to recovering all of
the culture that was stolen during the largest mass theft in
history, which until now, has been overshadowed by history's largest
mass murder."
(Reporting and writing by Steve Gorman in Los Angeles; Editing by
Michael Perry)
[© 2018 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
Copyright 2018 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |