South Dakota e-commerce sale tax fight
reaches U.S. Supreme Court
Send a link to a friend
[April 16, 2018]
By Lawrence Hurley
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A high-stakes
showdown at the U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday will determine whether
states can force out-of-state online retailers to collect sales taxes in
a fight between South Dakota and e-commerce businesses.
South Dakota is asking the nine justices to overturn a 1992 Supreme
Court precedent that states cannot require retailers to collect state
sales taxes on purchases unless the businesses have a "physical
presence" in the state.
The state, appealing a lower court decision that favored Wayfair Inc
<W.N>, Overstock.com Inc <OSTK.O> and Newegg Inc, is being supported by
President Donald Trump's administration.
A ruling favoring South Dakota could help small brick-and-mortar
retailers compete with online rivals while funneling up to $18 billion
into the coffers of the affected states, according to a 2017 federal
report.
The justices will hear arguments in the case on Tuesday against a
backdrop of Trump's harsh criticism of Amazon.com Inc<AMZN.O>, the
dominant player in online retail, on the issue of taxes and other
matters. Trump has assailed Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos, who owns the
Washington Post, a newspaper that the Republican president also has
disparaged.
Amazon, which is not involved in the Supreme Court case, collects sales
taxes on direct purchases on its site but does not collect taxes for
items sold on its platform by third-party venders, constituting around
half of total sales.
South Dakota depends more than most states on sales taxes because it is
one of nine that do not have a state income tax. South Dakota projects
its revenue losses because of online sales that do not collect state
taxes at around $50 million annually, while its opponents in the case
estimate it as less than half that figure.
Major retailers that have brick-and-mortar stores, and therefore already
collect taxes, are represented by industry groups that back South
Dakota. The National Retail Federation, which supports the state, has a
membership list that includes Walmart Inc<WMT.N> and Target Corp<TGT.N>,
as well as Amazon.
Stephanie Martz, the federation's general counsel, said in an interview
the case gives the Supreme Court a chance to adapt the law to new
circumstances prompted by the rise of internet shopping.
[to top of second column]
|
The South Dakota state capitol building is seen in Pierre, South
Dakota, U.S., February 7, 2018. REUTERS/Lawrence Hurley/File Photo
"Things have changed a lot since 1992. The entire nature of
interstate commerce has changed," Martz said.
E-commerce companies supporting Wayfair, Overstock and Newegg
include two that provide online platforms for individuals to sell
online: eBay Inc<EBAY.O> and Etsy Inc<ETSY.O>.
"Win or lose at the Supreme Court, we will continue to advocate for
a legislative solution and a level playing field where all retailers
collect and remit sales tax on the same basis," Wayfair spokeswoman
Jane Carpenter said in a statement.
Brian Bieron, eBay's senior director of government relations, said
in an interview the 1992 precedent "provides the many small
businesses that use the internet with a very clear and simple and
stable legal environment in which to grow their business."
Overturning the ruling while not replacing it with a new national
framework "is really going to be a negative move in terms of
e-commerce," Bieron added.
A 2016 South Dakota law requires out-of-state online retailers to
collect sales tax if they clear $100,000 in sales or 200 separate
transactions. State legislators knew the measure was unlawful under
the 1992 precedent.
The state sued a group of online retailers after the law was enacted
to force them to collect the state sale taxes, with the aim of
overturning the precedent.
(Reporting by Lawrence Hurley; Editing by Will Dunham)
[© 2018 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
Copyright 2018 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content.
|