Researchers examined data on socioeconomic status, chronic medical
problems, and walking speed – a proxy for physical functioning – for
109,000 adults ages 45 to 90 from 24 countries in Europe, the U.S.,
Latin America, Africa and Asia. Socioeconomic status includes
income, education and occupation and offers a snapshot of how class
shapes opportunities within a given society.
At age 60, men of low socioeconomic status had the same walking
speed as 67-year-old men with high socioeconomic status, meaning the
poorer and less educated people had almost seven fewer years of good
physical functioning, the study found.
Women at age 60, meanwhile, lost more than five years of good
physical functioning when they had low socioeconomic status,
compared to their more affluent counterparts.
“The impact of poor socioeconomic conditions on functioning is
comparable to that of major risk factors such as smoking or physical
inactivity,” said lead study author Silvia Stringhini of the
Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine at Lausanne University
Hospital and Lausanne University in Switzerland.
Plenty of previous research has linked poverty, a lack of education
and limited job prospects to an increased risk of chronic disease
and premature death, researchers note in the BMJ. Along the way,
many people experience a decline in physical functioning, which is
thought to be caused by the combination of limited resources and
complex medical problems.
The current study builds on this thesis by showing that in addition
to any chronic health problems that may hasten physical decline,
socioeconomic status is an independent risk factor for worsening
function. This means some poor people who are otherwise healthy may
still have an increased risk of losing physical function.
[to top of second column] |
Men and women of low socioeconomic status, for example, lost more
than five years of physical functioning to a lack of exercise, the
study found. They also lost five to seven years of good functioning
due to obesity, and about six years from diabetes.
The study wasn’t a controlled experiment designed to prove whether
or how socioeconomic status might directly impact health or physical
functioning.
Even so, the results suggest that doctors and policy makers should
focus on socioeconomic status as a risk factor for premature aging,
the authors conclude.
Efforts to promote disability-free aging will take on heightened
importance as the global population ages, particularly because
improvements in healthy aging haven’t kept pace with gains in life
expectancy, said Dr. Rachel Cooper, author of an accompanying
editorial and a researcher at the University College London in the
UK.
“Socioeconomic adversity is, alongside other risk factors, an
important target in global efforts to extend disability-free life
expectancy,” Cooper said by email. “These new findings provide
further empirical evidence in support of renewed calls for action to
address global increases in socioeconomic inequality as a matter of
urgency for the benefit of the health and wellbeing of our ageing
global population.”
SOURCE: http://bit.ly/2I02Gcv and http://bit.ly/2I02v0P BMJ, online
March 23, 2018.
[© 2018 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2018 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |