Exclusive: U.S. considers tightening grip on China ties
to corporate America
Send a link to a friend
[April 28, 2018]
By Koh Gui Qing
NEW YORK (Reuters) - The U.S. government
may start scrutinizing informal partnerships between American and
Chinese companies in the field of artificial intelligence, threatening
practices that have long been considered garden variety development work
for technology companies, sources familiar with the discussions said.
So far, U.S. government reviews for national security and other concerns
have been limited to investment deals and corporate takeovers. This
possible new expansion of the mandate - which would serve as a stop-gap
measure until Congress imposes tighter restrictions on Chinese
investments - is being pushed by members of Congress, and those in U.S.
President Donald Trump's administration who worry about theft of
intellectual property and technology transfer to China, according to
four people familiar with the matter.
Artificial intelligence, in which machines imitate intelligent human
behavior, is a particular area of interest because of the technology's
potential for military usage, they said. Other areas of interest for
such new oversight include semiconductors and autonomous vehicles, they
added.
These considerations are in early stages, so it remains unclear if they
will move forward, and which informal corporate relationships this new
initiative would scrutinize.
Any broad effort to sever relationships between Chinese and American
tech companies - even temporarily - could have dramatic effects across
the industry. Major American technology companies, including Advanced
Micro Devices Inc, Qualcomm Inc, Nvidia Corp and IBM, have activities in
China ranging from research labs to training initiatives, often in
collaboration with Chinese companies and institutions who are major
customers.
Top talent in areas including artificial intelligence and chip design
also flows freely among companies and universities in both countries.
The nature of informal business relationships varies widely.
For example, when U.S. chipmaker Nvidia Corp - the leader in AI hardware
- unveiled a new graphics processing unit that powers data centers,
video games and cryptocurrency mining last year, it gave away samples to
30 artificial intelligence scientists, including three who work with
China's government, according to Nvidia.
For a company like Nvidia, which gets a fifth of its business from
China, the giveaway was business as usual. It has several arrangements
to train local scientists and develop technologies there that rely on
its chips. Offering early access helps Nvidia tailor products so it can
sell more.
The U.S. government could nix this sort of cooperation through an
executive order from Trump by invoking the International Emergency
Economic Powers Act. Such a move would unleash sweeping powers to stop
or review informal corporate partnerships between a U.S. and Chinese
company, any Chinese investment in a U.S. technology company or the
Chinese purchases of real estate near sensitive U.S. military sites, the
sources said.
"I don't see any alternative to having a stronger (regulatory) regime
because the end result is, without it, the Chinese companies are going
to get stronger," said one of the sources, who is advising U.S.
lawmakers on efforts to revise and toughen U.S. foreign investment
rules. "They are going to challenge our companies in 10 or 15 years."
James Lewis, a former Foreign Service officer with the U.S. Departments
of State who is now with the Center for Strategic and International
Studies, said if the emergency act was invoked, U.S. government
officials including those in the Treasury Department could use it "to
catch anything they want” that currently fall outside the scope of the
regulatory regime.A White House official said that they do not comment
on speculation about internal administration policy discussions, but
added "we are concerned about Made in China 2025, particularly relevant
in this case is its targeting of industries like AI."
[to top of second column] |
President Donald Trump and China's President Xi Jinping shake hands
after making joint statements at the Great Hall of the People in
Beijing, China, November 9, 2017. REUTERS/Damir Sagolj/File Photo
Made in China 2025 is an industrial plan outlining China's ambition to
become a market leader in 10 key sectors including semiconductors,
robotics, drugs and devices and smart green cars.
Last month, the White House outlined new import tariffs that were
largely directed at China for what Trump described as "intellectual
property theft." That prompted Chinese President Xi Jinping’s government
to retaliate with sanctions against the United States.
Those moves followed proposed legislation that would toughen foreign
investment rules overseen by the Committee on Foreign Investment in the
United States (CFIUS), by giving the committee - made up of
representatives from various U.S. government agencies - purview over
joint ventures that involve "critical technology".
Republican and Democratic lawmakers who put forth the proposal in
November said changes are aimed at China.
Whereas an overhauled CFIUS would likely review deals relevant to
national security and involve foreign ownership, informal partnerships
are likely to be regulated by revised export controls when they come
into effect, sources said.
To be sure, sources said the Trump administration could change its mind
about invoking the emergency act. They added that some within the
Treasury Department are also lukewarm about invoking the emergency act
as they preferred to focus on passing the revised rules for CFIUS.
FOCUS ON AI
Chinese and U.S. companies are widely believed among analysts to be
locked in a two-way race to become the world's leader in AI. While U.S.
tech giants such as Alphabet Inc's Google are in the lead, Chinese firms
like Internet services provider Baidu Inc have made significant strides,
according to advisory firm Eurasia Group.
As for U.S. chipmakers, few are as synonymous with the technology as
Nvidia, one of the world's top makers of the highly complex chips that
power AI machines.
There is no evidence that Nvidia’s activities represent a threat to
national security by, for instance, offering access to trade secrets
such as how to make a graphics processing unit. Nvidia also said it does
not have joint ventures in China.
In a statement, Nvidia said its collaborations in China – including
training Chinese scientists and giving Chinese companies such as telecom
provider Huawei Technologies Co Ltd early access to some of its latest
technology - are only intended to get feedback on the chips it sells
there.
"We are extremely protective of our proprietary technology and
know-how," Nvidia said. "We don’t give any company, anywhere in the
world, the core differentiating technology."
Qualcomm did not respond to requests for a comment, while Advanced Micro
Devices and IBM declined to comment.
Nvidia is far from being the only U.S. tech giant, much less the only
chipmaker, that lends expertise to China. But it is clearly in the
sights of the Chinese. When the country’s Ministry of Science and
Technology solicited pitches for research projects last year, one of the
listed objectives was to create a chip 20 times faster than Nvidia's
"Five years ago, this might not be a concern," said Lewis, "But it's a
concern now because of the political and technological context."
(Additional reporting by Diane Bartz in WASHINGTON; Editing by Lauren
LaCapra and Edward Tobin)
[© 2018 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2018 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |