Refining margins hurt Exxon, Chevron quarterly results
Send a link to a friend
[April 28, 2018]
By Ernest Scheyder
HOUSTON (Reuters) - Weak refining margins
hurt Exxon Mobil Corp <XOM.N> and Chevron Corp's <CVX.N> first-quarter
profit, cutting into overall gains from rising oil prices.
It was the second consecutive quarter that refining weakness, especially
outside the United States, clipped improved profit.
Strength in the Chevron division that pumps oil and gas helped overcome
the refining weakness and beat Wall Street profit expectations for the
quarter.
Exxon, though, has struggled in recent quarters to boost oil and gas
output, and its overall first-quarterly results badly lagged
expectations.
Shares of Exxon fell 3.7 percent to $77.88 in afternoon trading while
Chevron rose 1.9 percent to $126.64. Exxon is off about 6.6 percent in
the last two years while Chevron has soared 24.5 percent.
"While the fourth quarter was a disaster for both, Chevron got back on
track" in the first quarter, said Brian Youngberg, an oil industry
analyst at Edward Jones. "Exxon's still trying to get back on the road."
Both Exxon and Chevron have consistently touted the benefits of owning
businesses that produce and refine oil, saying they better balance
earnings as commodity prices rise and fall.
U.S. oil prices <CLc1> fell slightly to $67.98 per barrel. [O/R]
Rising oil prices typically harm refiners by squeezing their margins on
products, but they also boost profit at divisions that produce crude.
The strategy worked for Chevron during the quarter, helping the company
top Wall Street expectations. At Exxon, weak refining results were
coupled with lower oil production, fueling concern about Chief Executive
Officer Darren Woods' turnaround plan for the world's largest publicly
traded oil producer.
Refining margins in Europe <BRT-ROT-REF>, for instance, fell more than
14 percent in the quarter and were on track for a 38 percent drop in the
second period, the biggest quarterly decline since the fourth quarter of
2015.
Profit fell 12 percent in Exxon's downstream refining unit, and 14
percent in its chemical unit.
At Chevron, earnings in refining and chemical operations dropped 21
percent to $728 million.
[to top of second column] |
A Chevron gas station sign is shown in Cardiff, California, January
25, 2016. REUTERS/Mike Blake/File Photo
Both companies have sought to bolster refining operations. Reuters
reported earlier this month that they have asked U.S. regulators for
exemptions to U.S. biofuels rules that are typically only given to small
companies in financial distress.
'NOT WHAT THE MARKET WANTS'
Both companies said they are accelerating shale drilling in the Permian
Basin of west Texas and New Mexico, the largest U.S. oilfield, helping
to lift the nation's output so far this year to more than 10 million
barrels per day, a new record.
(To view a graphic on Exxon's quarterly results, click here:
https://reut.rs/2Kg4peq)
Exxon's U.S. production swung to a $429 million profit from a
year-earlier loss. But Exxon has continued to invest heavily in projects
that will not produce oil or gas for years. In contrast, Chevron is
benefiting from past investments that have boosted output, especially in
liquefied natural gas.
Exxon also has struggled in the past 16 months to unwind some of the
biggest bets taken by former CEO Rex Tillerson, who left to become U.S.
secretary of state in early 2017 before being fired by President Donald
Trump last month.
"The Exxon strategy right now is not what the market wants," said Mark
Stoeckle, portfolio manager of Adams Natural Resources Fund <PEO.N>,
which holds Exxon shares.
"The market wants the cash back. They want what Exxon can't give them
today because of the mismatch between investment and production."
Exxon and Chevron told investors on Friday that it was too soon to begin
buying back shares, something Wall Street has pushed for.
(Reporting by Ernest Scheyder; Editing by Jeffrey Benkoe)
[© 2018 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2018 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |