Colorado baker in case of Supreme Court
sues state over 'persecution'
Send a link to a friend
[August 16, 2018]
By Keith Coffman
DENVER (Reuters) - A Colorado baker who won
a narrow Supreme Court victory over his refusal to make a wedding cake
for a gay couple is suing the state after it launched another case
against him for declining to create a cake for a transgender woman.
Jack Phillips, owner of Masterpiece Cakeshop in the city of Lakewood,
accuses Colorado’s Civil Rights Commission of violating his
constitutional rights to free speech, freedom of religion, equal
protection and due process, according to the lawsuit filed in U.S.
District Court in Denver on Tuesday.
“This lawsuit is necessary to stop Colorado’s continuing persecution of
Phillips,” the written complaint alleges. Also named in the lawsuit are
Governor John Hickenlooper and Cynthia Coffman, the state attorney
general.
Phillips seeks permanent injunctions against the state from taking any
enforcement action against Phillips, who the lawsuit says was
“vindicated” by the Supreme Court ruling.
In June, the Supreme Court ruled that the Colorado’s civil rights
commission was hostile toward Phillips’ Christian beliefs when it cited
him for refusing to bake a wedding cake for a same-sex couple in 2012,
but did not rule on whether he violated Colorado’s public accommodation
statute.
Through a spokeswoman, the civil rights commission declined to comment
on Phillips’ lawsuit.
The lawsuit stems from a complaint filed by Denver attorney Autumn
Scardina with the civil rights commission in 2017, in which she claims
that Phillips refused to bake a cake that “celebrates my transition from
male to female,” court documents showed.
Scardina did not immediately return a phone message left at her law
office.
[to top of second column]
|
Baker Jack Phillips decorates a cake in his Masterpiece Cakeshop in
Lakewood, Colorado U.S. on September 21, 2017. REUTERS/Rick
Wilking/File Photo
The director of the state’s Civil Rights Division, Aubrey Elenis,
ruled in June that Phillips discriminated against Scardina.
“The evidence thus demonstrates that the refusal to provide service
to (Scardina) was based on (her) transgender status,” Elenis wrote
in a probable cause determination.
The finding by Elenis requires both sides to resolve the issue
through “compulsory mediation,” the document said.
Phillips is also seeking $100,000 in punitive damages against Elenis
“for her unconstitutional actions,” according to the lawsuit.
Daniel Ramos, executive director of One Colorado, a group that
advocates for the LGBTQ community, blasted the Alliance Defending
Freedom (ADF), the conservative Christian group whose lawyers
represent Phillips.
"We have seen the ADF launch similar lawsuits across the country
that target nondiscrimination laws and civil rights agencies, and
this broad lawsuit they filed on behalf of Jack Phillips reads as
more of the same,” Ramos said.
(Reporting by Keith Coffman in Denver; Editing by Dan WHitcomb)
[© 2018 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
Copyright 2018 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |