In
a Thursday court filing, U.S. Department of Justice lawyers said
the changes would ensure an "efficient process" for
reunifications, without requiring that parents removed from the
United States be returned for that purpose.
But lawyers from the American Civil Liberties Union said in a
separate filing that some families could be "made whole" only if
parents were returned to the country, and the failure to address
their rights was a "significant" area of dispute.
They said this nevertheless should not impede "swift
reunification efforts," and that they "agree to the plan as
revised," including its provisions for locating and interviewing
removed parents.
The plan is the second stage of government efforts to reunite
2,551 children ages 5 to 17 with their parents, after they had
been separated under U.S. President Donald Trump's now-abandoned
"zero tolerance" policy toward illegal immigrants.
U.S. District Judge Dana Sabraw in San Diego ordered the
reunifications on June 26 and must approve any reunification
plan.
As of Thursday, 541 of the children remained separated and under
care of the Office of Refugee Resettlement, down from 559 a week
ago. Another 24 under age five also remained in federal care.
Many of those separated had crossed the border illegally, while
others had sought asylum at a border crossing.
A weekly hearing on the reunification process is scheduled for
Friday.
The reunification plan outlines means to locate removed parents,
determine their intentions for their children, and address
concerns about children's safety and parentage.
Thursday's revised plan contains dozens of changes.
One new provision would require the government to arrange travel
for children being reunited with their parents in their
countries of origin.
Another would ensure that such reunifications would not impair
those children's future ability to seek asylum if they returned
to the United States.
Justice Department lawyers urged Sabraw not to adopt a position
taken by immigrant rights advocates in similar lawsuits pending
in San Diego and Washington, D.C.
They said those advocates want to grant children of removed
parents a legal right to demand their return to consult on
asylum and related proceedings.
The government "strongly disputes" that this right exists, and
believes granting the request would "directly and significantly
interfere" with reunifications, its lawyers said.
Trump abandoned the separation policy on June 20 after broad
criticism at home and internationally.
(Reporting by Jonathan Stempel in New York; Editing by Tom Brown
and Diane Craft)
[© 2018 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2018 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content.
|
|