| 
		U.S. court says North Carolina 
		gerrymander is illegal, seeks new congressional map 
		 Send a link to a friend 
		
		 [August 28, 2018] 
		By Jon Herskovitz 
 (Reuters) - A federal court ruled on Monday 
		that North Carolina Republicans illegally drew up U.S. congressional 
		districts in the state to benefit their party, suggesting that new lines 
		be crafted before November's election.
 
 The three-judge panel for the U.S. District Court for the Middle 
		District of North Carolina said in a 321-page opinion that Republican 
		legislators responsible for the map conducted unconstitutional partisan 
		gerrymandering to dilute the impact of Democratic votes.
 
 “That is precisely what the Republican-controlled North Carolina General 
		Assembly sought to do here," the opinion said.
 
 The panel gave parties until Thursday to file their recommendations to 
		fix the problem.
 
 The decision could have national implications in this November's battle 
		for control of Congress. Democrats need to pick up 23 seats to gain a 
		majority in the U.S. House of Representatives that could thwart 
		Republican President Donald Trump's legislative agenda.
 
 Among the suggestions from the judges were holding state nominating 
		primaries in November with new district lines that remove illegal 
		partisan bias and then holding a general election before the new U.S. 
		Congress is seated in January 2019.
 
		 
		The North Carolina dispute centered on a congressional redistricting 
		plan adopted by the Republican-led legislature in 2016 after a court 
		found that Republican lawmakers improperly used race as a factor when 
		redrawing certain U.S. House districts after the 2010 census.
 The Republican lawmaker in charge of the plan said it was crafted to 
		maintain Republican dominance because "electing Republicans is better 
		than electing Democrats."
 
		Party officials were not immediately available for comment on the 
		court's decision.
 North Carolina Democratic Party Chairman Wayne Goodwin said the decision 
		"is a monumental and necessary line in the sand stating that politicians 
		cannot choose their voters by silencing other voters."
 
 [to top of second column]
 | 
            
			 
            
			Visitors wait to enter the U.S. Supreme Court, as the Court sent 
			back to a lower court a decision that Republicans in North Carolina 
			had drawn congressional district boundaries to give their party an 
			unfair advantage, in Washington, U.S., June 25, 2018. REUTERS/Toya 
			Sarno Jordan 
            
			 
            Republicans in 2016 won 10 of the 13 House districts - 77 percent of 
			them - despite getting just 53 percent of the statewide vote, nearly 
			the same result as in 2014.
 In June, the U.S. Supreme Court threw out a lower court ruling that 
			Republicans drew the boundaries to ensure electoral victories for 
			their party.
 
 But the justices sent the case back to the federal three-judge panel 
			to reconsider whether the plaintiffs, including a group of 
			Democratic voters, had the necessary legal standing to sue in the 
			case.
 
 "North Carolina’s gerrymandering was one of the most brazen in the 
			nation, where state legislative leaders proudly pronounced it a 
			partisan gerrymander," Rick Hasen, a professor at the University of 
			California, Irvine, wrote on his election law blog.
 
 (Reporting by Jon Herskovitz in Austin, Texas; Editing by Peter 
			Cooney)
 
		[© 2018 Thomson Reuters. All rights 
			reserved.] Copyright 2018 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, 
			broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.  
			Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. 
			
			
			 |