U.S. court says North Carolina
gerrymander is illegal, seeks new congressional map
Send a link to a friend
[August 28, 2018]
By Jon Herskovitz
(Reuters) - A federal court ruled on Monday
that North Carolina Republicans illegally drew up U.S. congressional
districts in the state to benefit their party, suggesting that new lines
be crafted before November's election.
The three-judge panel for the U.S. District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina said in a 321-page opinion that Republican
legislators responsible for the map conducted unconstitutional partisan
gerrymandering to dilute the impact of Democratic votes.
“That is precisely what the Republican-controlled North Carolina General
Assembly sought to do here," the opinion said.
The panel gave parties until Thursday to file their recommendations to
fix the problem.
The decision could have national implications in this November's battle
for control of Congress. Democrats need to pick up 23 seats to gain a
majority in the U.S. House of Representatives that could thwart
Republican President Donald Trump's legislative agenda.
Among the suggestions from the judges were holding state nominating
primaries in November with new district lines that remove illegal
partisan bias and then holding a general election before the new U.S.
Congress is seated in January 2019.
The North Carolina dispute centered on a congressional redistricting
plan adopted by the Republican-led legislature in 2016 after a court
found that Republican lawmakers improperly used race as a factor when
redrawing certain U.S. House districts after the 2010 census.
The Republican lawmaker in charge of the plan said it was crafted to
maintain Republican dominance because "electing Republicans is better
than electing Democrats."
Party officials were not immediately available for comment on the
court's decision.
North Carolina Democratic Party Chairman Wayne Goodwin said the decision
"is a monumental and necessary line in the sand stating that politicians
cannot choose their voters by silencing other voters."
[to top of second column]
|
Visitors wait to enter the U.S. Supreme Court, as the Court sent
back to a lower court a decision that Republicans in North Carolina
had drawn congressional district boundaries to give their party an
unfair advantage, in Washington, U.S., June 25, 2018. REUTERS/Toya
Sarno Jordan
Republicans in 2016 won 10 of the 13 House districts - 77 percent of
them - despite getting just 53 percent of the statewide vote, nearly
the same result as in 2014.
In June, the U.S. Supreme Court threw out a lower court ruling that
Republicans drew the boundaries to ensure electoral victories for
their party.
But the justices sent the case back to the federal three-judge panel
to reconsider whether the plaintiffs, including a group of
Democratic voters, had the necessary legal standing to sue in the
case.
"North Carolina’s gerrymandering was one of the most brazen in the
nation, where state legislative leaders proudly pronounced it a
partisan gerrymander," Rick Hasen, a professor at the University of
California, Irvine, wrote on his election law blog.
(Reporting by Jon Herskovitz in Austin, Texas; Editing by Peter
Cooney)
[© 2018 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
Copyright 2018 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content.
|