| 
		Exclusive: U.S. Army forms plan to test 
		40,000 homes for lead following Reuters report 
		 Send a link to a friend 
		
		 [August 28, 2018] 
		By Joshua Schneyer and Andrea Januta 
 NEW YORK (Reuters) - The U.S. Army has 
		drafted a plan to test for toxic lead hazards in 40,000 homes on its 
		bases, military documents show, in a sweeping response to a Reuters 
		report that found children at risk of lead poisoning in military 
		housing.
 
 The inspection program, if implemented, would begin quickly and 
		prioritize thousands of Army post homes occupied by small children, who 
		are most vulnerable to lead exposure. Ingesting the heavy metal can 
		stunt brain development and cause lifelong health impacts.
 
 The lead inspections would cost up to $386 million and target pre-1978 
		homes to identify deteriorating lead-based paint and leaded dust, water 
		or soil, according to the military documents.
 
 A draft Army Execution Order says the program's mission is to mitigate 
		all identified lead hazards in Army post homes in the United States. In 
		homes where dangers are detected, the Army would offer soldiers' 
		families "temporary or permanent relocation" to housing safe from lead 
		hazards, it says.
 
		
		 
		The Army's mobilization comes after Reuters published an investigation 
		https://www.reuters.com/investigates/special-report/usa-military-housing 
		on August 16 describing lead paint poisoning hazards in privatized 
		military base homes. It documented at least 1,050 small children who 
		tested high for lead at base clinics in recent years. Their results 
		often weren't being reported to state health authorities as required, 
		Reuters found.
 Behind the numbers were injured families, including that of a decorated 
		Army colonel, J. Cale Brown, whose son JC was poisoned by lead while 
		living at Fort Benning, in Georgia.
 
 The article drew a quick response from lawmakers, with eight U.S. 
		senators demanding action to protect military families living in base 
		housing.
 
 The Army's planned response is laid out in military documents, including 
		the draft Execution Order, minutes from a private meeting attended by 
		top Army brass, and other materials.
 
 One priority, detailed by Under Secretary of the Army Ryan McCarthy in 
		an August 22 meeting, is for the military's response to counter any 
		sense "that we … are not taking care of children of Soldiers and are not 
		taking appropriate action quickly enough," meeting minutes say. "The 
		Army will remain focused on the actions to assess, inspect, and mitigate 
		risks to Soldiers and Families," the minutes say, citing McCarthy and 
		Vice Chief of Staff General James C. McConville.
 
 Army spokeswoman Colonel Kathleen Turner acknowledged plans are being 
		formulated but said no decisions have been made. "Out of an abundance of 
		caution, we are going above and beyond current requirements to ensure 
		the safety of our soldiers and their families who work and live on all 
		of our installations," Turner said in a statement. "We are currently 
		evaluating all options to address these concerns.”
 
 Old lead-based paint becomes a poisoning hazard when it deteriorates, 
		and poor maintenance of military base homes can leave legions at risk. 
		About 30 percent of service families – including some 100,000 small 
		children – live in U.S. military housing owned and operated by private 
		companies in business with the military.
 
 There are nearly 100,000 homes on U.S. Army bases, and the lead 
		inspections are expected to focus on the approximately 40,000 built 
		before a 1978 U.S. ban on the sale of lead paint.
 
		
		 
		The plans depart from guidance that appeared on the Army Public Health 
		Center's website as recently as last week, which "discouraged" 
		lead-based paint inspections in Army homes. The website has since been 
		updated and omits that language.
 Under the plans, the documents show, the Army would:
 
 - Inspect all pre-1978 Army family housing units nationwide, including 
		visual lead-based paint assessments by certified personnel, 
		swipe-testing for toxic lead paint dust, and testing of tap water. Some 
		homes will also receive soil testing. This phase alone, described as 
		"near term actions," will cost between $328 million to $386 million, the 
		Army's Installation Services director estimated.
 
 [to top of second column]
 | 
            
			 
            
			Swab tests at residences in Fort Benning, Georgia, U.S. reveal in 
			red the presence of lead in this undated handout photo obtained by 
			FOIA from the US Army, received by Reuters August 15, 2018. U.S. 
			Army FOIA/Handout via REUTERS 
            
 
            - Temporarily or permanently relocate families when hazards are 
			found. "If a Family or Soldier are concerned with potential negative 
			impacts from lead; the U.S. Army will offer them a chance to 
			relocate to a new residence," the documents say. "We must do 
			everything we can to maintain that trust."
 - Conduct town hall meetings on Army posts to address residents' 
			lead concerns. The Army intends to do so with "empathy," the meeting 
			minutes say. "Tone is key and can be just as important as the 
			actions we take."
 
 The documents leave some questions unanswered. They don't say how 
			long it would take to inspect all 40,000 homes. Also unclear is 
			whether the Army has funds immediately available for the program, or 
			would need Congressional authorization to set them aside.
 
 The Army would ensure that the private contractors who operate base 
			housing "are meeting their obligations" to maintain base homes, the 
			documents say, and would require them to show compliance with lead 
			safety standards through independent audits.
 
 The documents do not discuss whether private housing contractors 
			would bear any of the costs of the lead inspections, or how any 
			repairs would be funded.
 
 In most cases, Army post homes are now majority-owned by private 
			real estate companies. Under their 50-year agreements with the Army, 
			corporate landlords operating military housing agreed to control 
			lead, asbestos, mold, and other toxic risks present in some homes, 
			particularly historic ones.
 
            
			 
			FAMILIES, SENATORS PRESS FOR ANSWERS
 The Army plans come as base commanders and housing contractors face 
			a wave of complaints about potential home lead hazards, and a rush 
			of military families seeking lead tests for their children.
 
 Last week, the hospital at Fort Benning, where Reuters reported that 
			at least 31 small children had tested high for lead exposure in 
			recent years, began offering "walk-in" lead testing. Some concerned 
			families are already being relocated; in other homes, maintenance 
			workers are using painter's tape to mark peeling paint spots that 
			residents found contained lead by using store-bought testing kits.
 
 Lead poisoning is preventable, and its prevalence in the United 
			States has declined sharply in recent decades. Still, a 2016 Reuters 
			investigation documented thousands of remaining exposure hotspots, 
			mostly in civilian neighborhoods.
 
 Last week, eight senators, including Republican Johnny Isakson of 
			Georgia and Democrat Claire McCaskill of Missouri, pushed amendments 
			to legislation to examine and address the military's handling of 
			lead exposure risks.
 
 In coming weeks, Army officials plan to meet with lawmakers to 
			address their concerns, the military documents show.
 
 (Edited by Ronnie Greene and Michael Williams)
 
		[© 2018 Thomson Reuters. All rights 
			reserved.] Copyright 2018 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, 
			broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.  
			Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. 
			
			 |