The ASR hip implants were recalled in 2010, after data suggested
they failed at a higher-than-expected rate. In 2013, the firm agreed
to pay nearly $2.5 billion to settle thousands of lawsuits from
those in the United States who said they were injured by the
implants. (http://reut.rs/I20AZB)
In India, J&J paid $2 million to patients for repeat surgeries and
about $250,000 in related diagnostic costs under its ASR
reimbursement program, but the panel criticized the company for
offering no compensation.
"The fact remains that no compensation ever has been made by the
firm in India to any patient," the panel said in a 118-page report
released late on Tuesday.
The panel was set up by the federal health ministry, which has said
it is reviewing the report.

In a statement, J&J said its unit did not have access to data on
patients who received implants because of patient confidentiality
regulations, but it had given "top priority" to supporting ASR
patients.
"The company has always put the health and safety of ASR patients
first in everything we do," it said.
About 93,000 people worldwide received ASR implants, the panel said,
about 4,700 of them in India.
Metal hip implant systems such as ASR were designed to be more
durable than a traditional metal-on-plastic ball-and-socket design.
But many Indian patients suffered adverse reactions from the
implant, the panel said.
[to top of second column] |

It also criticized J&J for being "evasive" in sharing information on
ASR's design with it. Only in 2015, five years after the ASR recall,
did the company run newspaper notices in India about the move.
"(This) shows the negligent behavior of the firm to reach out to the
affected patients," the panel said, calling for periodic
advertisements to raise patient awareness about the implants.
J&J denied the panel's assessment, saying its unit had not been
evasive and had "fully cooperated with the expert committee in their
investigation".
The panel findings, first reported by Indian media last week, have
sparked a public relations crisis for the U.S.-based company, which
has also faced criticism from patient rights activists.
J&J "has the responsibility to track patients, make them aware of
the adverse effects and compensate them," said Oommen C. Kurian, a
health researcher at the New Delhi-based Observer Research
Foundation.
(Reporting by Aditya Kalra; Editing by Clarence Fernandez)
[© 2018 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2018 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content.
 |