Ex-Trump campaign chief Manafort seeks to
move second trial out of Washington
Send a link to a friend
[August 29, 2018]
By Nathan Layne
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Lawyers for former
Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort said on Tuesday that they would
seek to move his second trial, scheduled to start next month, out of
Washington, D.C., due to concerns that a jury from the Democratic
stronghold would be biased.
Their request for a change of venue highlighted the extent to which
politics has coursed through the prosecution of Manafort, who U.S.
President Donald Trump defended as a "brave man" even after a jury
convicted him of tax and bank fraud in the first trial that ended last
week.
Manafort, who sought unsuccessfully to move the first trial away from
the Washington suburb of Alexandria, Virginia, is hoping for better luck
with Judge Amy Berman Jackson, who is presiding over the second case in
a federal court in Washington.
Jackson said she would entertain the motion but said she believed he
could get a fair trial in her court.
"This jurisdiction has had very high profile cases before," Jackson said
at a hearing on Tuesday. "I'd like to believe that is still possible."
Manafort, a longtime Washington lobbyist and consultant, faces seven
criminal counts in the upcoming trial, including allegations of money
laundering, obstruction of justice and failing to register as a foreign
agent for his work on behalf of pro-Russian politicians from Ukraine.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/38fbd/38fbd8bd8af3d3b90fd16d4390d2408e0b1e3b77" alt=""
Change of venue requests are rarely approved, according to two jury
consultants interviewed by Reuters.
In denying Manafort's motion to move the first trial to Roanoke,
Virginia, the judge rejected the notion that a jury pool from
Alexandria, which voted two-to-one for Hillary Clinton in 2016, would be
biased against associates of Trump.
The political tilt is more pronounced in Washington, which Clinton won
with 90 percent of the vote.
Leslie Ellis, a director at jury consulting firm DecisionQuest, saw a
bigger risk for Manafort in the probability that jurors from the capital
would be knowledgeable about lobbying, tax law and other issues central
to the case.
"Having case-relevant experience tends to be riskier for defendants
because it is easier for someone with some knowledge of a field to hold
a defendant to a higher standard than is appropriate or necessary,"
Ellis said.
JURY SELECTION SET FOR SEPT. 17
Manafort's trials are the first to arise out of Special Counsel Robert
Mueller's investigation of Russian meddling in the 2016 election,
although Mueller has secured a number of indictments, guilty pleas and
immunity deals.
[to top of second column]
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4aa1b/4aa1b730d44499bbd7a37513322b9bba2375b6fa" alt=""
Former Trump campaign manager Paul Manafort arrives for arraignment
on a third superseding indictment against him by Special Counsel
Robert Mueller on charges of witness tampering, at U.S. District
Court in Washington, U.S., June 15, 2018. REUTERS/Jonathan
Ernst/File Photo
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a81be/a81be41d4f7c33b98c6c968739fa1faaca92fb6a" alt=""
Berman said jury selection for the second trial would start on Sept.
17 and set opening statements for Sept. 24, a scheduling tweak she
said was aimed in part at appeasing Manafort's lawyers who had
requested a week delay in the trial's start date of Sept. 17.
The move came after an earlier bench conference in which Kevin
Downing, one of Manafort's lawyers, could be heard complaining to
the judge about the time pressure they were under. The conference
was supposed to be inaudible to attendees in the courtroom due to a
white-noise machine.
"We don't have the resources," Downing said. "We just finished a
trial last week."
Also on Tuesday, Jackson approved the prosecution's request to allow
evidence about Justice Department inspections in the 1980's that
found Manafort had failed to disclose lobbying activities for
foreign governments, one way the government planned to show that
Manafort knowingly broke the law.
But Jackson said she would limit what they could show and asked both
sides to agree on a stipulation that would tell the jury how
Manafort was notified about lobbying disclosure rules in the past in
a way that would not prejudice the jury.
(Reporting by Nathan Layne in Washington; Editing by Bill Trott,
Toni Reinhold)
[© 2018 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
Copyright 2018 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/902ff/902ff4561604c3716159c2ebd0e000ef601e1eb1" alt="" |