| 
		Ex-Trump campaign chief Manafort seeks to 
		move second trial out of Washington 
		 Send a link to a friend 
		
		 [August 29, 2018] 
		By Nathan Layne 
 WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Lawyers for former 
		Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort said on Tuesday that they would 
		seek to move his second trial, scheduled to start next month, out of 
		Washington, D.C., due to concerns that a jury from the Democratic 
		stronghold would be biased.
 
 Their request for a change of venue highlighted the extent to which 
		politics has coursed through the prosecution of Manafort, who U.S. 
		President Donald Trump defended as a "brave man" even after a jury 
		convicted him of tax and bank fraud in the first trial that ended last 
		week.
 
 Manafort, who sought unsuccessfully to move the first trial away from 
		the Washington suburb of Alexandria, Virginia, is hoping for better luck 
		with Judge Amy Berman Jackson, who is presiding over the second case in 
		a federal court in Washington.
 
 Jackson said she would entertain the motion but said she believed he 
		could get a fair trial in her court.
 
 "This jurisdiction has had very high profile cases before," Jackson said 
		at a hearing on Tuesday. "I'd like to believe that is still possible."
 
 Manafort, a longtime Washington lobbyist and consultant, faces seven 
		criminal counts in the upcoming trial, including allegations of money 
		laundering, obstruction of justice and failing to register as a foreign 
		agent for his work on behalf of pro-Russian politicians from Ukraine.
 
		
		 
		Change of venue requests are rarely approved, according to two jury 
		consultants interviewed by Reuters.
 In denying Manafort's motion to move the first trial to Roanoke, 
		Virginia, the judge rejected the notion that a jury pool from 
		Alexandria, which voted two-to-one for Hillary Clinton in 2016, would be 
		biased against associates of Trump.
 
 The political tilt is more pronounced in Washington, which Clinton won 
		with 90 percent of the vote.
 
 Leslie Ellis, a director at jury consulting firm DecisionQuest, saw a 
		bigger risk for Manafort in the probability that jurors from the capital 
		would be knowledgeable about lobbying, tax law and other issues central 
		to the case.
 
 "Having case-relevant experience tends to be riskier for defendants 
		because it is easier for someone with some knowledge of a field to hold 
		a defendant to a higher standard than is appropriate or necessary," 
		Ellis said.
 
		JURY SELECTION SET FOR SEPT. 17
 Manafort's trials are the first to arise out of Special Counsel Robert 
		Mueller's investigation of Russian meddling in the 2016 election, 
		although Mueller has secured a number of indictments, guilty pleas and 
		immunity deals.
 
 [to top of second column]
 | 
            
			 
            Former Trump campaign manager Paul Manafort arrives for arraignment 
			on a third superseding indictment against him by Special Counsel 
			Robert Mueller on charges of witness tampering, at U.S. District 
			Court in Washington, U.S., June 15, 2018. REUTERS/Jonathan 
			Ernst/File Photo 
            
			 
            Berman said jury selection for the second trial would start on Sept. 
			17 and set opening statements for Sept. 24, a scheduling tweak she 
			said was aimed in part at appeasing Manafort's lawyers who had 
			requested a week delay in the trial's start date of Sept. 17.
 The move came after an earlier bench conference in which Kevin 
			Downing, one of Manafort's lawyers, could be heard complaining to 
			the judge about the time pressure they were under. The conference 
			was supposed to be inaudible to attendees in the courtroom due to a 
			white-noise machine.
 
 "We don't have the resources," Downing said. "We just finished a 
			trial last week."
 
 Also on Tuesday, Jackson approved the prosecution's request to allow 
			evidence about Justice Department inspections in the 1980's that 
			found Manafort had failed to disclose lobbying activities for 
			foreign governments, one way the government planned to show that 
			Manafort knowingly broke the law.
 
 But Jackson said she would limit what they could show and asked both 
			sides to agree on a stipulation that would tell the jury how 
			Manafort was notified about lobbying disclosure rules in the past in 
			a way that would not prejudice the jury.
 
 (Reporting by Nathan Layne in Washington; Editing by Bill Trott, 
			Toni Reinhold)
 
		[© 2018 Thomson Reuters. All rights 
			reserved.] Copyright 2018 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, 
			broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.  
			Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. 
			
			
			 |