| 
		China's solar subsidy cuts erode the 
		impact of Trump tariffs 
		 Send a link to a friend 
		
		 [August 30, 2018] 
		By Nichola Groom 
 LOS ANGELES (Reuters) - A move by China to 
		slash subsidies for domestic solar installations has unleashed a flood 
		of low-cost Chinese-made panels onto the global market - pushing down 
		prices and eroding the impact of U.S. President Donald Trump’s tariff on 
		solar equipment imports, according to industry officials.
 
 That's good news for U.S. companies that purchase and install imported 
		solar panels, including Inovateus Solar and Pine Gate Renewables, which 
		had expected that the protectionist policy would raise their costs and 
		slow their business.
 
 The falling prices, however, will hurt panel manufacturers including 
		China’s Jinko Solar [JKSAA.UL] and Korea’s Hanwha Q CELLS, which had 
		announced hundreds of millions of dollars in U.S. solar manufacturing 
		investments in the expectation that tariffs would boost their profits.
 
 Trump announced a 30-percent levy on all imported solar panels in 
		January, his opening salvo in an escalating global trade war that he 
		says is aimed at helping U.S. manufacturers and other businesses rebound 
		from years of decline. Critics say the tariffs could backfire by hurting 
		other domestic industries that depend on imports.
 
		
		 
		The prospect of solar tariffs initially sent U.S. panel prices soaring, 
		making domestic manufacturing more profitable and drawing a handful of 
		new investments. But the tax on imports cooled the red-hot pace of U.S. 
		solar installations by raising panel costs.
 The U.S. solar industry employs more than 250,000 people, with about 40 
		percent of those people in installation and 20 percent in manufacturing, 
		according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration.
 
 The solar panel market shifted in June after China - the world’s top 
		solar installer and a major critic of the Trump tariff - announced a 
		plan to cut the amount of installed solar capacity this year nearly in 
		half by cutting subsidies for such projects. While the move could 
		undermine the effectiveness of Trump's tariffs on panels, China's 
		National Development and Reform Commission has said the subsidy cuts 
		were motivated mainly by domestic concerns about the industry's rapid 
		growth.
 
 Surging solar capacity has left China struggling to build sufficient 
		transmission infrastructure to link projects to the electrical grid, and 
		the finance ministry has scrambled to find billions of yuan in subsidies 
		owed to new projects.
 
 The subsidy reductions forced Chinese panel makers to find new buyers on 
		the export market. The increased global supply has driven down the cost 
		of buying a panel in the United States to about 40 cents a watt from 45 
		cents shortly after the tariff, according to pricing data from Wood 
		Mackenzie Power & Renewables. The research firm said prices could fall 
		to about 30 cents by the end of 2019 – less than they were before the 
		administration began considering a tariff in 2017.
 
 "It's becoming a buyer's market again," said Sheldon Kimber, chief 
		executive of U.S. developer Intersect Power, a solar project developer 
		founded in 2016 that has plans to purchase large volumes of panels 
		starting in 2019.
 
 The unexpected price declines are eroding the effectiveness of the 
		tariff in boosting manufacturing profits and could completely offset its 
		initial market impact by November, said Paul Strigler, a vice president 
		with Esplanade Capital, a Boston-based investment firm that has a fund 
		dedicated to solar energy investments.
 
		
		 
		White House spokeswoman Lindsay Walters did not respond to a request for 
		comment. The four-year tariff on solar modules steps down by 5 
		percentage points a year before expiring in 2022.
 The Solar Energy Industries Association (SEIA), a trade group 
		representing both solar developers and panel manufacturers, opposed the 
		tariffs as a net loss of industry jobs and revenue. The falling prices 
		mitigate some of the pain but still amount to a drag on growth, said 
		SEIA spokesman Dan Whitten.
 
 "It may be less bad than it could have been, but it's still not nearly 
		as good as it should be," he said.
 
 BRIGHTER OUTLOOK FOR DEVELOPERS
 
 Utility-scale solar developers including Cyprus Creek Renewables and 
		Southern Current told Reuters earlier this year that the higher panel 
		prices caused by the tariff had forced them to cancel or freeze plans 
		for more than $2.5 billion in projects – a figure that topped new 
		investments announced by manufacturing firms that benefitted from the 
		tariffs.
 
 [to top of second column]
 | 
            
			 
            
			Solar panels sit on the roof of SunPower Corporation in Richmond, 
			California March 18, 2010. REUTERS/Kim White/File Photo 
            
 
            Many installers are now feeling more optimistic. 
            South Bend, Indiana-based Inovateus Solar, for example, said lower 
			panel prices had helped it close a deal in June to develop a 6 
			megawatt system for the city of Pratt, Kansas and to revive hiring 
			plans.
 "The drop in panel prices has really helped stimulate more 
			activity," Inovateus co-founder TJ Kanczuzewski said in an 
			interview.
 
 The lower prices have also helped the economics of projects already 
			in the pipeline, especially those with marginal prospects for a 
			payoff, said Ben Catt, chief development officer of Charlotte, North 
			Carolina-based Pine Gate Renewables.
 
 Cypress Creek said the decline has yet to resuscitate its shelved 
			projects for 2018, but the company said it expects panel prices to 
			keep falling, potentially helping projects next year.
 
 "Ramping construction up and down is not something that happens 
			overnight," said Cypress Creek's director of government affairs, 
			Hewitt Strange.
 
 Southern Current did not respond to requests for comment.
 
 Colin Smith, an analyst for Wood Mackenzie Power & Renewables, said 
			he expects the U.S. utility-scale solar market to expand between 
			2020 and 2023 because of the falling price of panels, instead of 
			remaining flat as the firm had forecast earlier this year.
 
 "The market has become comfortable again,” Smith said.
 
 MANUFACTURING 'MORE CHALLENGING'
 
 Panel manufacturers that announced U.S. expansions in response to 
			the tariffs - including China’s Jinko Solar, California-based 
			SunPower Corp and Canada's Heliene - said they still planned to move 
			forward with planned investments.
 
 But the falling prices are forcing them to operate at a lower 
			margin, they said, to compete against foreign rivals who benefit 
			from lower labor and material costs.
 
            
			 
			"It makes domestic manufacturing that much more challenging," 
			SunPower Chief Executive Tom Werner said in an interview.
 SunPower earlier this year agreed to take over the Oregon factory of 
			troubled SolarWorld Americas - one of the companies that sought the 
			tariffs. The deal is expected to close before the end of the third 
			quarter, SunPower said. The facility is capable of producing nearly 
			a gigawatt of solar cells and modules a year, or enough energy to 
			power about 700,000 homes.
 
 Jinko's investor relations director, Sebastian Liu, called the price 
			collapse a normal fluctuation and said the firm was "making 
			reasonable margins" thanks to a focus on higher efficiency products 
			and lower costs for polysilicon, solar's key raw material. He said 
			Jinko will begin producing panels at a U.S. facility in Florida in 
			the fourth quarter of this year.
 
 Heliene President Martin Pochtaruk said his company had weathered 
			such price drops before and would do so again as it works toward 
			opening its Minnesota factory next month. Heliene took over the 
			facility in May of 2017 and has invested $21.5 million to get it up 
			and running. The company expects to produce 140 MW of panels there a 
			year.
 
 Heliene said it would focus on cost cuts to compensate for falling 
			prices.
 
 "It is of course stressing" Pochtaruk said of the sudden market 
			shift, but also "business as usual" in a volatile sector.
 
 (Reporting by Nichola Groom; Editing by Richard Valdmanis and Brian 
			Thevenot)
 
		[© 2018 Thomson Reuters. All rights 
			reserved.] Copyright 2018 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, 
			broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.  
			Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. 
			
			 |