| 
		Abortion looms over Senate fight on 
		Supreme Court nominee 
		 Send a link to a friend 
		
		 [August 31, 2018] 
		By Lawrence Hurley and Andrew Chung 
 WASHINGTON/NEW YORK (Reuters) - When a U.S. 
		appeals court last week rejected an Alabama abortion law, one of the 
		court's judges bemoaned having to base the decision on Roe v. Wade, the 
		Supreme Court ruling that legalized abortion, calling it an "aberration 
		of constitutional law."
 
 The views of 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals Chief Judge Ed Carnes, a 
		Republican appointee to the Atlanta-based court, are shared by many 
		conservatives opposed to the landmark 1973 ruling.
 
 The big question is whether conservative U.S. appeals court judge Brett 
		Kavanaugh, President Donald Trump's nominee to fill a vacancy on the 
		Supreme Court, is one of them.
 
 The possibility he could vote to overturn Roe v. Wade will be a top line 
		of questioning when Kavanaugh appears before a U.S. Senate panel for his 
		confirmation hearing, starting on Tuesday.
 
 A Reuters/Ipsos opinion poll last month found that 68 percent of 
		Democrats believed abortion should be legal, while 61 percent of 
		Republicans said the procedure in general should be illegal.. The issue 
		has come to highlight the deep divide between the two parties.
 
 Yet, some on both sides question whether Roe v. Wade could easily be 
		overturned, given the Supreme Court's tradition of standing by its older 
		decisions. Under a principle known as stare decisis, the court tries to 
		protect its credibility by avoiding politicization and keeping the law 
		evenhanded.
 
		
		 
		During an Aug. 21 meeting, Kavanaugh told Senator Susan Collins, a 
		moderate Republican who favors abortion rights, that Roe v. Wade was 
		"settled law," she said afterward.
 The court is currently split 4-4 between conservatives and liberals. 
		Former Justice Anthony Kennedy, whom Kavanaugh would replace if he is 
		confirmed by the Senate, disappointed fellow conservatives by affirming 
		abortion rights in two key cases.
 
 Still, precedents can be cast aside. For instance, just two months ago, 
		the conservative majority, including Kennedy, overturned a major 1977 
		labor law precedent. The ruling came after two earlier rulings that 
		undermined it.
 
 "Rarely if ever has the court overruled a decision - let alone one of 
		this import - with so little regard for the usual principles of stare 
		decisis," liberal Justice Elena Kagan wrote in a dissenting opinion.
 
 ROAD MAP FOR ROE
 
 The stakes are high in the Senate battle over Kavanaugh because, if 
		confirmed, he could provide a decisive fifth vote on the nine-justice 
		court to overturn or weaken Roe v. Wade.
 
 Doing that would likely prompt many conservative-leaning states to take 
		steps to outlaw abortion altogether.
 
 In the run-up to the Kavanaugh hearings, abortion rights groups have 
		held rallies nationwide, while opponents of Roe v. Wade are optimistic 
		that Kavanaugh will be on their side.
 
		
		 
		"I hope that there will be a future majority to overturn Roe, and I hope 
		Kavanaugh would be among them," Clarke Forsythe, a lawyer with 
		anti-abortion group Americans United for Life, said in an interview.
 [to top of second column]
 | 
            
			 
            
			Mallory Quigley, Vice President of Communication at the Susan B. 
			Anthony List, a leading anti-abortion group, poses on a residential 
			street where local activists from her organization were canvassing 
			in favor of President Donald Trump's Supreme Court Nominee, Judge 
			Brett Kavanaugh, in Wheeling, West Virginia, U.S., August 29, 2018. 
			Picture taken August 29, 2018. REUTERS/Mana Rabiee 
            
			 
            Abortion opponents could use the recent labor case decision as a 
			road map to overturning Roe by taking up a series of abortion cases 
			that would also criticize Roe's validity.
 "Five years of decisions questioning (Roe) - that could change 
			things," said John McGinnis, a law professor at Northwestern 
			Pritzker School of Law.
 
 Most analysts expect a steady weakening of Roe as opposed to a quick 
			reversal. "They probably won't do it instantly, but they will 
			probably get there eventually," said Carolyn Shapiro, a law 
			professor at Chicago-Kent College of Law.
 
 Trump pledged during the 2016 election campaign to appoint judges 
			hostile to Roe v. Wade, a stance that won over social conservatives 
			who helped him defeat Democrat Hillary Clinton.
 
 The president's fellow Republicans narrowly control the Senate and 
			can ensure Kavanaugh's confirmation if they avoid defections from 
			their ranks.
 
 NO DIRECT RULING
 
 When Trump named him in July as his Supreme Court nominee, Kavanaugh 
			emphasized his Catholic faith. In a decade as a judge, he has not 
			ruled directly on abortion, although he has signaled sympathy for 
			legal arguments by anti-abortion advocates.
 
 If Kavanaugh is confirmed, the Supreme Court could soon wade back 
			into the abortion debate. Legal battles over state bans on the 
			procedure in early pregnancy are working through the courts.
 
            
			 
			Amy Hagstrom Miller, founder and chief executive of Whole Woman's 
			Health, which manages abortion clinics in several states, said she 
			had spent her whole career working with the fate of Roe v. Wade 
			hanging in the balance.
 Her clinic won the last major Supreme Court ruling on abortion in 
			2016, when the justices struck down strict regulations in Texas.
 
 "This time I think Roe could fall," she said. "But you have to stand 
			up for what's right even when the odds are against you."
 
 (Reporting by Lawrence Hurley and Andrew Chung; Editing by Kevin 
			Drawbaugh and Peter Cooney)
 
		[© 2018 Thomson Reuters. All rights 
			reserved.] Copyright 2018 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, 
			broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.  
			Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |