| 
 As the legend goes, Alexander the Great was called to solve a 
puzzle. 
 An oracle had declared that he who unwound a spectacular knot, one made with a 
yoke of an old wagon in the city of Gordium, would rule all of Asia. Coming upon 
the knot, Alexander struggled to untangle the mess. Instead, he drew his sword 
and sliced through it with a single stroke. He would go on to conquer one of the 
greatest empires in world history.
 
 The Illinois city of Harvey – population 25,000 – is stuck in something of a 
Gordian knot. Harvey hit headlines in April when a state-backed diversion of its 
revenue to pay for pensions forced the city to lay off about 40 public safety 
personnel.
 
 Harvey’s pension debt is more than three times its annual operating revenue, but 
the state constitution does not allow for a reduction in current or even 
unearned future retirement benefits.
 
 What about raising taxes? Harvey’s tax base is shrinking and its local effective 
property tax rates already are among the highest in the state.
 What about borrowing? Because of mayoral malfeasance, the city is iced out of 
the bond market.
 
 What about restructuring? Illinois does not generally authorize municipalities 
to file for federal bankruptcy protection.
 
 What about a state bailout? This may alleviate Harvey’s problem, but should be 
off the table given Illinois’ record-breaking pension debt of its own.
 
 With limited tools to cut costs, raise revenue or borrow money, Harvey’s knot is 
tightly bound. It is drowning. And it is not alone.
 
 Nearly 200 downstate police and fire pension systems are less than 50 percent 
funded. Many of those areas are shrinking in population as well, with residents 
and businesses already facing a high tax burden.
 
 The city of Peoria, which saw its population drop more severely than any of the 
50 largest cities in Illinois from 2016-2017, announced this week that it was 
sending layoff notices to more than two dozen employees. The city’s own budget 
documents warn “the growth in pension obligations is crowding out the use of 
property taxes for operations,” and that come 2019, 100 percent of its property 
tax dollars will be diverted from operations to pension payments.
 
 
[to top of second column] | 
 Untangling these knots requires sober analysis that 
			isn’t happening among legislative leaders in Springfield or on the 
			campaign trails. It is an urgent problem, because the last resort – 
			the sword of bankruptcy – is not pretty. But given the alternative 
			is the utter chaos of insolvency, it could be the only path 
			available to places such as Harvey. Other communities across the country have dealt 
			with these knots before. Illinoisans might not know it, but a small 
			city on the Atlantic Ocean might be a vision of what’s to come for 
			distressed municipalities in the Prairie State.
 Central Falls, Rhode Island, is very similar to Harvey. With 19,000 
			residents, it is a lower-income city a few miles away from a larger 
			one, and it faced $80 million in pension and healthcare debt with a 
			$19 million annual budget as of 2010. The state intervened, meeting 
			with the city’s retirees to ask them to voluntarily accept a cut to 
			their retirement benefits. But workers rejected the plan, and in the 
			end, Central Falls had to file for Chapter 9 bankruptcy. Local 
			residents saw their taxes hiked and pensioners saw their benefits 
			cut by up to 55 percent. Pension promises are not protected in 
			bankruptcy.
 
 This is not a future any Illinoisan should desire. And yet, 
			lawmakers will be forced to reconsider the state’s rules on 
			municipal bankruptcies in the near future. The math demands it.
 
 One way to make that conversation more productive is to bring 
			public-sector unions to the table and decide on what a fair 
			amendment to the Illinois Constitution’s pension clause should look 
			like. Even with pension reform, Harvey’s knot might still prove too 
			gnarled. But many communities could avoid having to rely on the 
			“sword” of bankruptcy and untangle their knots properly if lawmakers 
			make pension reform a priority.
 
			
			 As the Illinois Policy Institute’s Adam Schuster describes in a new 
			report, the 2013 bipartisan pension reforms struck down by the 
			Illinois Supreme Court offer a good starting point for what change 
			could look like, though five years of inaction since then will 
			necessitate stronger medicine. A constitutional amendment that 
			allows for changes in future benefits while protecting what public 
			employees have already earned is key to making those changes 
			possible.
 If lawmakers continue to balk at building the tools necessary to 
			reform pensions, bankruptcy will be the only way out for communities 
			across the state.
 
 The knots grow tighter each day.
 
			
            
			Click here to respond to the editor about this article |