Trump urges 'full sentence' for his
ex-lawyer Cohen in Russia probe
Send a link to a friend
[December 04, 2018]
By Doina Chiacu and Jan Wolfe
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - President Donald
Trump on Monday called for a "full and complete" sentence for his former
lawyer Michael Cohen, accusing him of lying about Trump's business
dealings with Russia during the 2016 presidential campaign to get
reduced jail time.
Cohen, who is cooperating with a federal probe into whether Trump's
campaign worked with Russia to sway the election, is scheduled to be
sentenced on Dec. 12 after pleading guilty to tax evasion, making false
statements to a bank, campaign finance violations, and lying to
Congress.
In a court filing last week, Cohen said he had pursued a proposed Trump
Organization real estate project in Moscow with Russian government
officials well into the presidential campaign, with Trump's knowledge.
Cohen, once Trump's self-described "fixer," admitted he lied to Congress
when he said efforts to pursue the Moscow project ended in January 2016,
when they actually continued until June 2016, after Trump had clinched
the Republican presidential nomination.
Lawyers for Cohen asked a federal judge in New York on Friday not to
sentence him to prison.
After the plea deal, Trump described Cohen as weak and a liar and said
he himself did nothing wrong in relation to the Moscow project.
In a series of tweets on Monday, the president accused Cohen of
cooperating with Special Counsel Robert Mueller's Russia probe in
exchange for a reduced sentence on the unrelated tax fraud and campaign
finance charges.
"'Michael Cohen asks judge for no Prison Time'. You mean he can do all
of the TERRIBLE, unrelated to Trump, things having to do with fraud, big
loans, Taxis, etc., and not serve a long prison term?" Trump said. "He
lied for this outcome and should, in my opinion, serve a full and
complete sentence."
Trump has described Mueller's probe as a political witch hunt. Russia
denies interfering in the U.S. election.
It is unusual for a U.S. president or any senior government official to
comment on court proceedings. Trump has regularly opined on sensitive
judicial proceedings from the special counsel's case to federal appeals
court rulings.
Several lawyers said Trump's tweet amounted to witness tampering.
PARDON ROULETTE
Trump's comments about Cohen contrasted with his expressions of sympathy
for former associates caught in the web of Mueller's investigation,
including former 2016 campaign chairman Paul Manafort, who faces
sentencing after being convicted of tax and bank fraud charges.
[to top of second column]
|
President Donald Trump's former lawyer Michael Cohen exits Federal
Court after entering a guilty plea in Manhattan, New York City,
U.S., November 29, 2018. REUTERS/Andrew Kelly/File Photo
The Republican president has refused to rule out a pardon for
Manafort.
On Monday, Trump praised longtime associate and Republican operative
Roger Stone, who has been under scrutiny by investigators over his
comments about leaked Democratic emails during the 2016 presidential
campaign. Stone told ABC News on Sunday he would not testify against
Trump and has not discussed a pardon with the president.
"Nice to know that some people still have 'guts!'" Trump said in
another Twitter post on Monday.
There was a strong case against the president for witness tampering
because of his prior acts and statements, like dangling the
possibility of a pardon for his Manafort, legal experts said.
George Conway, who is married to senior Trump adviser Kellyanne
Conway, retweeted Trump's tweet with a reference to a U.S. statute
on witness tampering and obstruction of justice: "File under '18
U.S.C. §§ 1503, 1512.'"
"I think it is both obstruction and witness tampering," said Lisa
Kern Griffin, a former federal prosecutor and law professor at Duke
University. "He (Trump) is attempting to influence an ongoing
investigation in an overt way."
Federal law makes it a crime to knowingly intimidate, threaten, or
persuade another person to withhold testimony in an investigation.
It is highly inappropriate for a president to insert himself into a
judicial process, said Jens Ohlin, a professor at Cornell Law
School. "He’s not just a regular person. He’s the head of the
executive branch."
(Reporting by Doina Chiacu; Additional reporting by Brendan Pierson
and Karen Freifeld in New York; Editing by Grant McCool and Paul
Simao)
[© 2018 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
Copyright 2018 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |