| 
						Investors recalibrate chances of Brexit reversal after 
						May defeats
		 Send a link to a friend 
		
		 [December 05, 2018]   
		By Guy Faulconbridge and Sujata Rao 
 LONDON (Reuters) - U.S. investment bank 
		J.P. Morgan said on Wednesday the chances of Britain calling off its 
		divorce from the European Union had increased after a string of 
		humiliating parliamentary defeats for Prime Minister Theresa May cast 
		new doubt over her plan to quit the bloc and sent sterling higher.
 
 Britain's pro-Brexit trade minister Liam Fox also said it was now 
		possible that Brexit would not happen. There was a real danger that 
		parliament would try to "steal" Brexit from the British people, Fox told 
		a parliamentary committee on Wednesday.
 
 In one of the biggest shifts in perceptions since the shock 2016 vote to 
		exit the EU, J.P. Morgan raised the probability of Britain ultimately 
		staying in to 40 percent from 20 percent.
 
 Ever since the referendum, investors have speculated that the United 
		Kingdom's biggest economic and political shift since World War Two could 
		ultimately be thwarted, though it was unclear what the mechanism might 
		be.
 
 
		
		 
		"The UK now appears to have the option of revoking unilaterally and 
		taking a period of time of its own choosing to decide what happens 
		next," J.P. Morgan economist Malcolm Barr wrote in a note to clients.
 
 He placed a 10 percent probability on a no deal Brexit, down from 20 
		percent, and a 50 percent probability on an orderly Brexit, down from 60 
		percent.
 
 On Tuesday, just hours before the start of a five-day debate in the 
		British parliament on May's Brexit deal, an adviser to the European 
		Court of Justice (ECJ) said Britain could pull back its formal divorce 
		notice without needing the agreement of the other 27 members.
 
 While it is a non-binding opinion and the ECJ is still to rule, the 
		opinion from Advocate General Manuel Campos Sanchez-Bordona also upped 
		the chances of Brexit not happening as planned on March 29.
 
 Silvia Dall'Angelo, senior economist at Hermes Investment Management, 
		offered a similar view to J.P. Morgan's assessment.
 
 "Beyond the blows of defeat to the Prime Minister in the House of 
		Commons yesterday, news from the European Court of Justice that the UK 
		could unilaterally reverse Article 50 makes a no Brexit a more realistic 
		option."
 
		
            [to top of second column] | 
            
			 
            
			Britain's Prime Minister Theresa May leaves 10 Downing Street in 
			London, Britain, December 5, 2018. EUTERS/Peter Nicholls 
            
			 
"The government has previously denounced this route, but the road to Brexit is 
becoming increasingly contingent on financial markets' and businesses' ability 
to push the government," he wrote in a note.
 Sterling <GBP=D3>, which has see-sawed on Brexit news since the referendum, 
touched a 17-month low on Tuesday but recouped much of its overnight losses on 
Wednesday as optimism grew that Britain may not leave the EU without a deal in 
place.
 
 VOTE REVERSE POSSIBLE
 
 In the June 23, 2016 referendum, 17.4 million voters, or 52 percent, backed 
Brexit while 16.1 million, or 48 percent, backed staying in the bloc.
 
 To leave the EU on the terms May has negotiated, she needs parliament to approve 
her deal. Yet that looks unlikely.
 
 In significant defeats on Tuesday, her government was found in contempt of 
parliament and then a group of her own Conservative Party lawmakers won a 
challenge to hand more power to the House of Commons if her deal is voted down. 
A final vote is due on Dec. 11.
 
 If May loses, the future of the world's fifth-largest economy is uncertain. She 
has warned Britain could leave without a deal or that there could be no Brexit 
at all.
 
 J.P. Morgan said a second referendum appeared more likely than a general 
election as the route to thwarting Brexit.
 
 Supporters of Brexit have said that if Brexit is reversed, the United Kingdom 
will be thrust into a constitutional crisis as what they say the financial and 
political elite will have thwarted the democratic will of the people.
 
 But many business chiefs and investors fear a chaotic Brexit that they say would 
weaken the West, spook financial markets and silt up the arteries of trade.
 
 (Reporting by Guy Faulconbridge; Editing by Angus MacSwan)
 
				 
			[© 2018 Thomson Reuters. All rights 
				reserved.] Copyright 2018 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, 
			broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.  
			Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. 
			
			
			 |