North Carolina Republicans open to new U.S. House seat vote if fraud found

Send a link to a friend  Share

[December 07, 2018]  By Letitia Stein

(Reuters) - North Carolina Republican Party leaders said on Thursday they would be open to holding a new congressional election in a district roiled by fraud allegations if a state investigation finds enough evidence that the outcome of the race was affected.

Almost a month after Republican Mark Harris declared victory in his race for a seat in the U.S. House of Representatives, the North Carolina board of elections is declining to certify the result as it investigates mail-in ballots from two rural counties.

If fraud is uncovered, the board could order a new vote. Democrats in the U.S. House are also calling for an investigation and could rule on the contest when they take control of the chamber next year.

North Carolina Republican Party Chairman Robin Hayes said his party supports a public hearing by the state election board on the investigation into allegations of improper handling of ballots by political operatives.

"If they can show a substantial likelihood it could have changed the race then we fully would support a new election," he said in a statement, adding that Harris should be certified the winner if the ballots in question would not have changed the outcome.

Based on an initial tally, Harris edged out Democrat Dan McCready by 905 votes.



That was before residents of rural Bladen County provided sworn affidavits that people came to their homes and collected absentee ballots that they had not filled in. It is illegal in North Carolina for a third party to turn in absentee ballots.

An analysis by Michael Bitzer, a politics and history professor at Catawba College in North Carolina, found Harris won 61 percent of these votes, even though registered Republicans cast only 19 percent of the absentee ballots.

To explain the results, Harris would have needed to also win every voter unaffiliated with a party, or about 39 percent of the absentee voters, along with some Democratic votes, Bitzer said.

"I'm not saying that can't happen, but there is a very high probability that it did not," Bitzer told Reuters by phone, noting the absentee vote in the rest of the district favored McCready.

Bladen and another rural community under review, Robeson County, saw high interest in absentee ballots this year with abnormally large numbers of ballots unreturned, Bitzer's analysis showed.

[to top of second column]

Mark Harris attends a debate between the four top-polling Republican candidates in North Carolina for the U.S. Senate, at Davidson College in Davidson, North Carolina April 22, 2014. REUTERS/Davis Turner/File Photo

Republican state lawmakers on Thursday said questions have been raised about mail-in ballots in Bladen County for years, including in elections where Democrats appeared to benefit.

In a press conference, a group of Republican legislators called for Governor Roy Cooper, a Democrat, to convene a bipartisan panel to investigate, claiming the state's elections board was not neutral despite having bipartisan representation.

Democratic leaders questioned their motives.

"Republicans claim to care about putting a stop to election fraud and protecting the integrity of our elections," North Carolina Democratic Party chairman Wayne Goodwin told reporters. "But with the most egregious case of election tampering our state has seen in decades in front of all of us, Republican lawmakers are attempting to pass blame and derail an ongoing investigation."

The state elections board has said it would hold a hearing by Dec. 21.

The contest will not affect the balance of power in the new Congress. Democrats already gained enough seats to take control of the House, while Republicans expanded their Senate majority.

(Reporting by Letitia Stein in Tampa, Florida; editing by Colleen Jenkins and David Gregorio)

[© 2018 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved.]

Copyright 2018 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.  Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content.

Back to top