| 
 A report released Nov. 27 by realtor.com forecasts the 
Chicago-Naperville-Elgin Metropolitan Area will experience the worst housing 
market slowdown among 100 of the nation’s metropolitan areas in 2019. 
 As mortgage rates are slowly creeping up to 5.5 percent, home sales are expected 
to slow nationwide. However, the slowdown is anticipated to be nearly four times 
worse in Chicago than in the rest of the nation.
 
 Illinois homeowners are subject to the highest overall tax burden in the 
country, including the second highest property taxes in the nation. They’re also 
weathering the largest permanent income tax hike in state history. As these 
costs rise, the value of homeownership in the Land of Lincoln falls relative to 
other areas, reducing demand for housing.
 
 Furthermore, as median home prices are expected to appreciate by 2.2 percent 
throughout the nation, the typical Chicago area home will likely lose nearly 2 
percent of its total value in 2019, according to the realtor.com forecast.
 
 The combination of steeply declining home sales and values lands the Chicagoland 
housing market at the bottom for 2019.
 
   Why is housing demand declining faster in Chicago?
 Chicago’s disturbing housing market performance comes as no surprise. Illinois 
is one of only three states where single family homes became a worse investment 
relative to before the housing bubble.
 
 The poor health of the state’s – and Chicago’s – real estate market is due to a 
variety of factors.
 
 Outmigration
 
 For starters, the Illinois population has been declining for four consecutive 
years, second only to West Virginia. The Chicago metro area was the only one of 
the 10 largest metro areas to experience population decline last year. While 
births still outpace deaths in Illinois and Chicago, the population has been 
declining due to persistent outmigration.
 
 The shrinking population isn’t due to snowbirds retiring to warm-weather states 
such as Florida. The primary driver of the state’s population decline is from 
prime working-age Illinoisans (25-54 years old) moving away. Not only is 
Illinois hemorrhaging its current workforce, hindering the growth in home prices 
and sales, but population losses are also compromising its future workforce as 
these working-age adults move away with their children. As the decline in 
Illinois’ youngest population cohorts – those most likely to be buying homes – 
are more severe than in the rest of the nation, the weak Illinois housing market 
can be expected to continue.
 
 Property taxes
 
 For decades, Illinois property taxes have skyrocketed compared to home values, 
growing 43 percent faster than home values statewide and 76 percent faster than 
home values in Cook County.
 The dramatic rise in property taxes 
has resulted in Illinoisans now paying the second-highest rates in the nation.[to top of second column]
 In some cases residents accept increased property taxes where they anticipate 
the funds will finance local services that will improve the quality of their 
neighborhoods and result in home price appreciation. However, this has not been 
the case in Illinois: For the past 20 years, fewer than 50 cents of every 
additional dollar paid in property taxes has gone to delivery of current 
services.
 
 When additional government spending is wasted, and does not go toward the 
delivery of current services or improved services — all else being equal — 
higher property taxes do not increase the desirability of a neighborhood. This 
lack of improvement for additional tax dollars can cause housing prices to fall.
 
 Income taxes
 
 In 2017, Illinoisans were hit with the largest permanent income tax hike in 
state history, raising the income tax to 4.95 percent from 3.75 percent. While 
this 32 percent increase in the state’s individual income tax burden would be 
damaging enough on its own, the fact that neighboring states have been reducing 
income taxes since the end of the recession makes Illinois an even less inviting 
place to buy a house.
 
 
 | 
 The most recent tax hike, just like the 2011 tax 
			hike, can be expected to have severely negative consequences for 
			investment within the state, resulting in fewer jobs and a smaller 
			economy. In fact, some of these effects are already being felt as 
			Illinois’ private-sector job creation ranks among the worst in the 
			nation in the year since the income tax hike. Employment growth and housing price growth are 
			strongly correlated. Recent economic research highlights links 
			between regional labor and housing markets. In their article, “The 
			Recent Evolution of Local U.S. Labor Markets,” authors Maximiliano 
			Dvorkin and Hannah Shell examined the recession and recovery by 
			reviewing the correlation between county-level unemployment rates 
			and changes in housing prices. U.S. counties with larger decreases 
			in housing prices experienced larger increases in the unemployment 
			rate.
 This means declining home price appreciation could have negative 
			spillover effects on the rest of Illinois’ economy. Illinois’ weaker 
			housing market recovery is consistent with the state’s much weaker 
			employment growth and weaker economic growth when compared to the 
			rest of the country.
 
 2019 could be worse than projected
 
 While recent public policy has certainly hindered the health of the 
			state’s housing market, the situation could be worse than projected 
			in 2019.
 
 Gov.-elect J.B. Pritzker made passage of a progressive income tax a 
			key pillar of his campaign. While promoted as a tax break for the 
			middle-class, the states Pritzker suggested as models for this tax 
			change would all impose higher income taxes on the typical Illinois 
			family. Moreover, the most recent progressive tax proposal filed in 
			the Illinois General Assembly would have raised taxes on those 
			earning more than $17,300.
 
 Even if Pritzker’s progressive tax proposal were not about 
			generating new revenue to fund campaign promises of higher spending, 
			a progressive income tax would be worse for the state’s economy than 
			Illinois’ constitutionally protected flat income tax.
 
 Changing the forecast
 
 If Pritzker wants to improve the forecast for Chicagoland – and 
			Illinois as a whole – the state needs lasting, meaningful reforms to 
			government cost drivers.
 
			 
 First, Illinois homeowners need real, sustained property tax relief. 
			Currently, homeowners face the second-highest property tax burden in 
			the nation, largely because of an unsustainable public pension 
			system that is at least $130 billion in debt.
 
 If Illinois and its local governments were able to reform their 
			unaffordable pension systems, the state could contribute more money 
			toward classroom spending and reduce its overall spending. 
			Communities could provide property tax relief to make their housing 
			more attractive.
 
 Second, Illinoisans need a state government that spends within its 
			means and doesn’t raise income taxes while other states cut theirs.
 
 The Illinois Policy Institute proposed a path to balancing the 
			budget that requires no tax increases. One key policy solution the 
			Institute offered for fiscal year 2019 is a spending cap, which 
			would limit the growth in government spending to the 10-year average 
			growth rate of the state economy. Tying government spending to 
			economic growth protects taxpayers from future tax hikes. Democratic 
			and Republican lawmakers proposed spending caps as constitutional 
			amendments in the Illinois Senate and House of Representatives this 
			year.
 
 Without property and income tax relief, housing in Illinois will 
			continue to be less attractive, Illinois’ population will likely 
			continue its decline, and the Chicago-area housing market will 
			continue to be among the worst in the nation.
 
 
			
            
			Click here to respond to the editor about this article |