| 
		Cosby's lawyers cite grounds for 
		appealing sexual assault conviction 
		 Send a link to a friend 
		
		 [December 12, 2018] 
		By Suzannah Gonzales 
 (Reuters) - Attorneys for Bill Cosby 
		outlined their grounds on Tuesday for appealing his sexual assault 
		conviction, citing what they called errors in legal procedure that may 
		have biased the jury and warrant a new trial for the once-beloved 
		comedian.
 
 The 81-year-old performer, best known for his role as the lovable family 
		man and physician on the hit television sitcom "The Cosby Show," was 
		found guilty by a Pennsylvania jury in April of drugging and sexually 
		assaulting a onetime friend in 2004.
 
 It marked the first such criminal conviction of a celebrity accused of 
		sexual misconduct since the #MeToo movement that has brought down dozens 
		of powerful, privileged men in American media, politics and business 
		since the autumn of 2017.
 
 In September, the trial judge, Steven O'Neill, designated Cosby a 
		"sexually violent predator" under Pennsylvania law, requiring the 
		entertainer to register as a sex offender for life, and sentenced him to 
		a term of three to 10 years in prison.
 
 Cosby, who is married, has insisted all along that any sexual encounters 
		he had were consensual. He was found guilty on three counts of 
		aggravated indecent assault.
 
		
		 
		
 In an eight-page filing laying out the basis of their appeal, Cosby's 
		lawyers focused on several instances they said introduced bias into the 
		trial, including the judge's refusal to excuse a juror that the defense 
		argued was unable to be fair and impartial.
 
 The defense asserted that the juror in question had stated an 
		inclination to believe Cosby guilty at the outset of the trial, and that 
		fellow jurors were never interviewed to determine whether they had heard 
		the comment or were swayed by it.
 
 In addition, according to the filing, O'Neill failed to recuse himself 
		or disclose a biased relationship with Bruce Castor, a former Montgomery 
		County district attorney with whom defense lawyers said the judge had a 
		confrontation.
 
 Cosby's lawyers have argued that Castor promised in 2005 that Cosby 
		would not be prosecuted if he agreed to sit for a sworn deposition in a 
		civil suit brought against him by his accuser, former Temple University 
		administrator Andrea Constand.
 
 [to top of second column]
 | 
            
			 
            
			Actor and comedian Bill Cosby leaves the Montgomery County 
			Courthouse after his first day of sentencing hearings in his sexual 
			assault trial in Norristown, Pennsylvania, U.S., September 24, 2018. 
			REUTERS/Jessica Kourkounis 
            
 
            That deposition, in which Cosby acknowledged giving sedatives called 
			Quaaludes to young women for purposes of having sex with them, was 
			unsealed a decade later, and Castor's successor, District Attorney 
			Kevin Steele, cited it as a crucial piece of evidence when criminal 
			charges were brought.
 The judge should not have allowed Cosby's civil deposition testimony 
			about Quaaludes to be introduced in his criminal trial, the defense 
			said, arguing it was not relevant to Constand's allegations and was 
			highly prejudicial because it included statements regarding the 
			illegal act of giving a narcotic to another person.
 
 Cosby's attorneys also faulted the judge for allowing prosecutors to 
			call as witnesses other accusers whose allegations, the defense 
			argued, were too remote in time and too dissimilar to Constand's 
			allegations.
 
 Moreover, the defense asserted that a prosecution expert who 
			testified relied on hearsay evidence of about 50 additional women 
			who had leveled sexual misconduct allegations against Cosby.
 
 Under the state's appeals process, the trial judge will write an 
			opinion by explaining his reasoning for the rulings the defense has 
			challenged, and the matter will ultimately be decided by 
			Pennsylvania's appellate-level Superior Court.
 
 A representative for the prosecution did not immediately respond to 
			a request for comment on the filing.
 
 (Reporting by Suzannah Gonzales in Chicago; Editing by Steve Gorman 
			and Peter Cooney)
 
		[© 2018 Thomson Reuters. All rights 
			reserved.] Copyright 2018 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, 
			broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.  
			Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. 
			
			
			 |