J&J shares nosedive on report it knew of asbestos in
Baby Powder
Send a link to a friend
[December 15, 2018]
By Saumya Joseph
(Reuters) - Shares of Johnson & Johnson <JNJ.N>
fell 10 percent on Friday and were on track to post their biggest
percentage drop in more than 16 years, after Reuters reported that the
pharma major knew for decades that cancer-causing asbestos lurked in its
Baby Powder.
The decline in shares erased about $40 billion from the company's market
capitalization, with investors worrying about the impact of the report
as it faces thousands of talc-related lawsuits.
The stock was the biggest drag on the broader Dow Jones Industrial
Average <.DJI> and S&P 500 <.SPX> indexes and was among the most traded
on U.S. exchanges. About 28 million shares exchanged hands by 1830 GMT,
more than three times its 25-day moving average.
J&J was found to have known about the presence of small amounts of
asbestos in its products from as early as 1971, a Reuters examination of
company memos, internal reports and other confidential documents showed.
The report also said the company had commissioned and paid for studies
conducted on its Baby Powder franchise and hired a ghostwriter to
redraft the article that presented the findings in a journal.
In response to the report, the company said "any suggestion that Johnson
& Johnson knew or hid information about the safety of talc is false."
"This is all a calculated attempt to distract from the fact that
thousands of independent tests prove our talc does not contain asbestos
or cause cancer," Ernie Knewitz, J&J's vice president of global media
relations, wrote in an emailed response to the report.
The company also said Baby Powder was asbestos-free and added it would
continue to defend the safety of its product.
At least two Wall Street analysts said the stock appeared to be oversold
on the news.
"In our opinion litigation overhangs are real, and we do not minimize
the situation, but the stock pull back does seem over done to us," BMO
Capital Markets analyst Joanne Wuensch said.
[to top of second column] |
A Johnson & Johnson building is shown in Irvine, California, U.S.,
January 24, 2017. REUTERS/Mike Blake/File Photo
J&J, in 1976, had assured the U.S. Food and Drug Administration that no asbestos
was "detected in any sample" of talc produced between December 1972 and October
1973 when at least three tests by three different labs from 1972 to 1975 had
found asbestos in its talc.
The company has been battling more than 10,000 cases claiming its Baby Powder
and Shower to Shower products cause ovarian cancer. The products have also been
linked with mesothelioma, a rare and deadly form of cancer that affects the
delicate tissue that lines body cavities.
"We believe it is highly unlikely the company's exposure to this talc issue will
even come close to the $40 billion in lost market cap today," J.P. Morgan
analysts said.
They added that talc was not an issue that would resolve quickly for J&J and
expect shares to trade at a lower multiple pending further clarity on the
company’s exposure to the issue.
While J&J has dominated the talc powder market for more than 100 years, the
products contributed to a mere 0.5 percent of its revenue of $76.5 billion last
year. Talc cases make up fewer than 10 percent of all personal injury lawsuits
pending against the company.
However, Baby Powder is considered essential to J&J's image as a caring company
– a "sacred cow," as one 2003 internal email put it.
CFRA Research analyst Colin Sarcola said, "We see today's news potentially
impacting sales of everything from baby shampoo to prosthetic hips."
"Given these elevated risks, we no longer feel JNJ shares are attractive at
recent prices," Sarcola added.
Shares were last down 8 percent at $135.85, also pulling down the broader S&P
500 healthcare index <.SPXHC>.
(Reporting by Saumya Sibi Joseph in Bengaluru; Editing by Shinjini Ganguli and
Sweta Singh)
[© 2018 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2018 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |