Federal judge rules Obamacare
unconstitutional
Send a link to a friend
[December 15, 2018]
(Reuters) - A federal judge in Texas
on Friday ruled the Affordable Care Act, commonly known as Obamacare,
was unconstitutional based on its mandate requiring that people buy
health insurance, a decision in a case that could reach the U.S. Supreme
Court.
U.S. District Judge Reed O'Connor in Fort Worth agreed with a coalition
of 20 states that a change in tax law last year eliminating a penalty
for not having health insurance invalidated the entire Obamacare law.
The coalition of states challenging the law was led by Texas Attorney
General Ken Paxton and Wisconsin Attorney General Brad Schimel, both
Republicans.
Republicans have opposed the 2010 law - the signature domestic policy
achievement of Republican President Donald Trump's Democratic
predecessor Barack Obama - since its inception and have repeatedly tried
and failed to repeal it.
O'Connor ruled that under the logic of the landmark 2012 Supreme Court
ruling that upheld the law, the individual mandate, which required that
most Americans obtain health insurance or pay a tax, is now
unconstitutional.

In the 2012 ruling, a majority of the justices concluded that the
individual mandate unconstitutionally imposed a requirement that
Americans buy insurance. However, a different majority held the mandate
amounted to a constitutional tax penalty.
On Friday, O'Connor ruled that after Trump signed a $1.5 trillion tax
bill passed by Congress last year that eliminated the penalties, the
individual mandate could no longer be considered constitutional.
He said because the individual mandate was an "essential" part of
Obamacare, the entire law, rather than just the individual mandate, was
unconstitutional.
"In some ways, the question before the Court involves the intent of both
the 2010 and 2017 Congresses," he wrote. "The former enacted the ACA.
The latter sawed off the last leg it stood on."
O'Connor's decision was issued the day before the end of a 45-day
sign-up period for 2019 health coverage under the law.
[to top of second column]
|

A sign on an insurance store advertises Obamacare in San Ysidro, San
Diego, California, U.S., October 26, 2017. REUTERS/Mike Blake

About 11.8 million consumers nationwide enrolled in 2018 Obamacare
exchange plans, according to the U.S. government's Centers for
Medicare and Medicaid Services.
A spokeswoman for California Attorney General Xavier Becerra, who
was among a group of Democratic attorneys general defending the law,
said they would appeal the decision. An appeal would go to the 5th
U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.
White House spokeswoman Sarah Sanders said in a statement the law
would remain in place pending its expected appeal to the Supreme
Court.
Trump hailed the ruling and called on Congress to act. "Now Congress
must pass a STRONG law that provides GREAT healthcare and protects
pre-existing conditions," Trump said in a tweet.
U.S. Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer said he hoped the
decision would be overturned.
"If this awful ruling is upheld in the higher courts, it will be a
disaster for tens of millions of American families, especially for
people with pre-existing conditions," Schumer said in a statement.
In June, the Justice Department partially sided with the Republican
state attorneys general, agreeing that the individual mandate must
be struck down as unconstitutional but arguing several other
provisions could survive.
(Reporting by Eric Beech in Washington and Nate Raymond in Boston;
Editing by Sandra Maler and Sam Holmes)
[© 2018 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
Copyright 2018 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content.
 |