Maryland judge to weigh Obamacare case
Send a link to a friend
[December 19, 2018]
By Sarah N. Lynch
(Reuters) - Days after a judge in Texas
declared that the Obamacare healthcare law is unconstitutional,
Maryland's Democratic attorney general on Wednesday will pursue his
request that another judge rule the opposite way.
The lawsuit brought by Maryland Attorney General Brian Frosh also seeks
to challenge President Donald Trump’s appointment of Matthew Whitaker as
acting attorney general, another bone of partisan contention.
Frosh is asking U.S. District Judge Ellen Hollander in Baltimore to
declare that the 2010 health law, known as the Affordable Care Act, is
lawful in a bid to counter attempts by the Trump administration to
undermine it.
Hollander will weigh the Whitaker claim along with the government's
motion to dismiss the case on the grounds that Maryland does not have
legal standing to bring the case.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ff06e/ff06e5e968c6f64f5efb71955df9809b7fbcc6cd" alt=""
On Friday, a judge in Texas ruled that the entire healthcare law was
unconstitutional following revisions to the tax code by the
Republican-controlled Congress last year, which removed the tax penalty
for failing to buy health insurance. Trump, who has worked for years to
undermine Obamacare, on Twitter called the Texas judge's decision "a
great ruling for our country."
The Texas judge ruled in favor of 20 states, including Texas.
The original lawsuit by the 20 states prompted Maryland to sue the
federal government over then-U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions's
refusal to defend the portions of the Obamacare law being challenged in
Texas.
[to top of second column]
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b422c/b422c65429a1d0996e8671ae711eb55be2a7b39c" alt=""
A sign on an insurance store advertises Obamacare in San Ysidro, San
Diego, California, U.S., October 26, 2017. REUTERS/Mike Blake/File
Photo
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0af5e/0af5ef921f8e347efac5153c806a46259f7fdf23" alt=""
Trump forced Sessions out of office in early November and named
Whitaker to replace him as acting attorney general.
In response to that, Maryland asked Judge Hollander to issue an
injunction barring Whitaker from serving, saying his appointment
violated both the Constitution and a federal law that governs the
line of succession at the Justice Department.
Then on Dec. 7, Trump nominated William Barr to become attorney
general on a permanent basis. He would replace Whitaker, pending
Senate review, likely in early 2019.
Maryland has asked Hollander to issue a declaratory judgment
upholding Obamacare's constitutionality.
If Hollander rules on whether Obamacare is constitutional, her
decision could potentially be at odds with the decision in Texas.
That could create a conflict among lower courts of the sort the U.S.
Supreme Court often likes to tackle.
(Reporting by Sarah N. Lynch; Editing by Kevin Drawbaugh and James
Dalgleish)
[© 2018 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
Copyright 2018 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5e7d7/5e7d71a6b4d832bc47421331d78d206c410a3118" alt="" |