U.S. appeals court grants Trump request
for halt to emoluments case
Send a link to a friend
[December 21, 2018]
By Jan Wolfe
(Reuters) - A U.S. appeals court on
Thursday halted a lawsuit accusing President Donald Trump of violating
anti-corruption provisions in the U.S. Constitution, saying it would
review crucial preliminary rulings that allowed the case to proceed.
The Richmond, Virginia-based 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals said it
would review a set of lower court rulings that allowed Democratic
attorneys general of Maryland and the District of Columbia to move
forward with the case.
The appeals court said it would hear oral arguments in the case in March
and froze legal discovery in the case, evidence-gathering that could
force disclosure of Trump’s financial records.
U.S. Department of Justice lawyers representing Trump had urged the
appeals court to step in, rather than wait until a final judgment in the
case was issued.
"The complaint rests on a host of novel and fundamentally flawed
constitutional premises, and litigating the claims would entail
intrusive discovery into the President's personal financial affairs and
the official actions of his Administration," the Justice Department said
in a court filing.
The lawsuit, filed in June 2017, said Trump failed to disentangle
himself from his hotels and other businesses, making him vulnerable to
inducements by foreign officials seeking to curry favor. One of the
Constitution’s emoluments provisions bars U.S. officials from accepting
gifts or other emoluments from foreign governments without congressional
approval.
[to top of second column]
|
U.S. flags fly over the Trump International Hotel in Washington,
U.S., August 3, 2018. REUTERS/Brian Snyder/File Photo
U.S. District Judge Peter Messitte, presiding over the case in
Greenbelt, Maryland, has narrowed the lawsuit to claims involving
Trump International Hotel in Washington and not Trump’s businesses
beyond the U.S. capital.
Messitte ruled in March that the two attorneys general had legal
standing to pursue the case, and in July rejected what he called
Trump’s "cramped" view that emoluments were limited essentially to
outright bribes.
The two attorneys general on Dec. 4 issued subpoenas for financial
records from Trump’s businesses.
(Reporting by Jan Wolfe; editing by Diane Craft)
[© 2018 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
Copyright 2018 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content.
|