Pennsylvania top court redraws voting map
in boost to Democrats
Send a link to a friend
[February 20, 2018]
(Reuters) - Pennsylvania's top court
on Monday unveiled a new map carving out the state's U.S. congressional
voting districts, imposing a plan it said was based on "traditional
criteria" after rejecting a proposal drawn up by Republican lawmakers as
unconstitutional.
The state Supreme Court had ruled that the Republican plan effectively
marginalized likely Democratic voters. As a result, the Republicans have
a more than 2-1 advantage in the state's U.S. House of Representatives
delegation, even though the number of registered Republicans and
Democrats in Pennsylvania is roughly even.
The court-imposed plan could help Democrats who want to gain control of
the U.S. Congress in the November midterm elections.
The new map "is composed of congressional districts which follow the
traditional redistricting criteria of compactness, contiguity, equality
of population, and respect for the integrity of political subdivisions,"
the court's order said. (http://bit.ly/2FeQtPJ)
State Republican leaders condemned the new map, saying the court was
usurping the powers of the legislative and executive branches.
"We anticipate further action in federal court" to challenge the new
boundaries, state Senate President Pro Tempore Joe Scarnati and state
House Speaker Mike Turzai said in a statement.
Susan Carty, president of the League of Women Voters of Pennsylvania,
which was among 19 plaintiffs in the lawsuit, said lawmakers should heed
the ruling.
"To avoid future gerrymanders and court intervention, the legislature
should now work toward creating an independent, impartial and
accountable redistricting process,” she said in a statement.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/74880/7488030bdf7deb40abff8f6dcbe994ff45f8b053" alt=""
The justices redrew the boundaries with the help of independent experts
after Democratic Governor Tom Wolf last week rejected a proposal drawn
by Republican legislative leaders as unfairly skewed in their party's
favor.
[to top of second column]
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3dda5/3dda573fa1855ca08c174833f6317171acbbe063" alt=""
Legal battles are playing out in several U.S. states over
gerrymandering, the process by which district lines are manipulated
to favor one party. Pennsylvania has long been seen as one of the
worst offenders, with one of its districts nicknamed "Goofy Kicking
Donald Duck," a reference to a cartoon image evoked by its odd
shape.
Pennsylvania is a hotly contested swing state, and the redistricting
is expected to boost Democrats' chances of winning several of the
U.S. House seats in the state in November.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/aee55/aee55886b11dfe99b131935d760479bd862117ee" alt=""
Democrats must gain 24 seats nationwide to take control of the House
from Republicans. Republicans hold 13 of Pennsylvania's 18
congressional seats.
The new map means that Democrats could win up to 11 seats in
Pennsylvania in midterm elections, said Michael Li, a lawyer with
the Brennan Center for Justice at New York University's law school,
which filed an amicus brief in the case.
"This is the map that many people think is natural for Pennsylvania,
which is a 50-50 state, a classic battleground, but hasn't performed
that way in terms of congressional elections for decades," he said
by telephone.
The Republican-controlled legislature created the current map in
2011, after the 2010 U.S. census. The U.S. Supreme Court has
rejected Republicans' appeal of the state court's ruling in January
striking down the boundaries.
(Reporting by Jonathan Allen in New York and Ian Simpson in
Washington; Editing by Leslie Adler and Lisa Shumaker)
[© 2018 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
Copyright 2018 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |