Researchers surveyed 327 breast cancer patients treated from 2012 to
2016. This included 269 women who underwent breast-conserving
surgery known as a lumpectomy as well as radiation therapy; it also
included 58 women who opted for a mastectomy, a more aggressive
procedure to remove the entire breast.
While most women said they initially didn’t know much about
radiation, roughly half had heard frightening stories, the survey
found. After radiation, however, 92 percent of patients said they
wouldn’t have been as scared if they had known in advance what to
expect.
“There are many scary word-of-mouth stories out there and many
unfounded concerns or concerns from another era,” said senior study
author Dr. Susan McCloskey, of the David Geffen School of Medicine
at the University of California Los Angeles.
“But in fact over the last 20 years there have been significant
advances in how radiation therapy for breast cancer is delivered,
allowing us to spare critical organs, create an individual radiation
plan for each patient and also deliver radiation in more convenient
schedules,” McCloskey said by email. “These advances have improved
the care and the treatment experience.”
Most early-stage breast cancer patients have either a lumpectomy or
a mastectomy, and many of them get chemotherapy or radiation
afterward to destroy any remaining abnormal cells and reduce the
risk of cancer coming back.
Depending on the type and dose of radiation, long-term side effects
may include nerve pain, heart damage, and lung problems.
In the current study, published in the journal Cancer, half of the
women were at least 59 years old, and they had typically completed
treatment 31 months prior to doing the survey.
Overall, 83 percent of the women who underwent radiation reported
that the severity of both short-term and long-term side effects was
better than or no worse than they had expected.
[to top of second column] |
In addition, 75 percent of women who had a lumpectomy and radiation
said the changes to their breast size were less than expected, and
89 percent of them found the appearance of their breast to be better
than or similar to what they originally anticipated.
One limitation of the study is that it only included patients at a
single institution, and results might be different for women treated
elsewhere, the authors note.
In particular, outcomes at a high-quality practice that specializes
in breast radiation might be better than results at another place,
noted Dr. Benjamin Smith of the University of Texas MD Anderson
Cancer Center in Houston.
Still, the results highlight the need for patients and doctors to
have better communication about what women can expect from breast
cancer treatment, Smith, who wasn’t involved in the study, said by
email.
“What is surprising here is the disconnect between patients fears
and reality,” Smith said. “This elegant study highlights important
misconceptions that likely contribute to anxiety and distress; in
many cases patients don’t need to be scared of radiation treatments
for breast cancer.”
Women need to appreciate that any radiation they get today won’t be
the same as what was typical in their mothers’ day, said Dr. Kathryn
Evers, director of breast imaging at the Fox Chase Cancer Center in
Philadelphia.
“Modern forms of radiotherapy have many fewer negative side effects
than they might imagine and there are definite advantages in terms
of long-term prognosis,” Evers, who wasn’t involved in the study,
said by email.
SOURCE: http://bit.ly/2ovvsIK Cancer, online February 26, 2018.
[© 2018 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2018 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |