The suit highlights uncertainty among consumers about production
practices in the $500 million organic egg industry, farmers said,
after the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) last month shelved
plans to spell out for the first time what it means for birds to
have access to the outdoors.
Wal-Mart sells cartons of eggs to shoppers at a premium under its
Organic Marketside brand with labels saying the eggs came from hens
with "outdoor access," according to the lawsuit filed by a customer.
However, the birds are raised by Cal-Maine Foods Inc inside enclosed
structures that have screens to let in air, the complaint said.
"Consumers paying more for these eggs have been deceived," the
lawsuit said. "The theoretical ability to view the outdoors is not
the same as having access to it."
Wal-Mart said it had not reviewed the allegations, but was taking
them seriously.
"We hold our suppliers to high standards and are committed to
providing our customers the quality products they expect," spokesman
Randy Hargrove said.
Representatives of Cal-Maine, which is the biggest U.S. egg producer
and also named in the lawsuit, did not immediately respond to
requests for comment.
Enclosed structures, known as porches, meet USDA standards for
producers of organic livestock to provide "year-round access for all
animals to the outdoors," experts said.
But many consumers expect egg-laying hens will be able to touch the
soil and have access to sunshine, said David Bruce, general manager
of eggs for Organic Valley, the largest U.S. cooperative of organic
farmers.
[to top of second column] |
"It's very important that consumers get what they think they're
paying for," he said. "You can't have holes like this that allow
that kind of deception."
The USDA in 2016 issued a proposal that would have defined outdoors
as an area in the open air with at least 50 percent soil.
The move was part of an attempt to increase confidence among
consumers about organic labels at a time when the USDA said at least
half organic egg production came from operations that exclusively
used roofed porches to provide outdoor access to hens.
The USDA last year withdrew the proposal.
The case is Donnie Lee Gibson v Wal-Mart Stores et al, U.S. District
Court, Northern District of California, No. 18-00134.
(This version of the story was refiled to delete an extraneous word
in the first sentence)
(Additional reporting by Nandita Bose in New York; editing by G
Crosse)
[© 2018 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2018 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
|