Plug wars: the battle for electric car supremacy
Send a link to a friend
[January 24, 2018]
By Christoph Steitz
FRANKFURT (Reuters) - German carmakers hope
a network of high-power charging stations they are rolling out with Ford
will set an industry standard for plugs and protocols that will give
them an edge over electric car rivals.
At the moment, Tesla and carmakers in Japan and Germany use different
plugs and communication protocols to link batteries to chargers, but
firms building the charging networks needed for electric vehicles to
become mainstream say the number of plug formats will need to be limited
to keep costs down.
Carmakers behind the winning technology will benefit from having an
established supply chain and an extensive network, making their vehicles
potentially more attractive to customers worried about embarking upon
longer journeys, analysts say.
Manufacturers that back losing plugs, however, could end up with
redundant research and development and may have to invest to adapt
assembly lines and vehicle designs so their customers can use the most
widespread fast-charging networks.
Swiss bank UBS has estimated that $360 billion will need to be spent
over the next eight years to build global charging infrastructure to
keep pace with electric car sales, and it will be key to limit the
numerous technologies now in use.
"The quick-charging marketplace might be growing fast but the issue of
different types of connectivity and communication will need to be
resolved going forward," UBS said in a study published this month.
To try to build critical mass for the Combined Charging System (CCS)
favored by Europe, BMW, Mercedes-Benz maker Daimler, Ford and the
Volkswagen group, which includes Audi and Porsche, said in November they
would develop 400 high-power charging stations on main roads in 18
European countries by 2020.
"In the end, it is about safe-guarding investments for those that are
investing in electric mobility," said Claas Bracklo, head of
electromobility at BMW and the chairman of the Charging Interface
Initiative (CharIN), which is backing CCS.
"We have founded CharIN to build a position of power."
It is still early days for electric cars and difficult to predict which
plug technology will prevail or even whether there will always be
different ways to charge vehicles, unlike the one-size-fits-all nozzle
that can refill all petrol cars.
But there is a lot at stake for the carmakers ploughing billions of
dollars into the development of batteries and electric cars.
FORMAT WARS
Besides CCS, there are three other standards that will charge batteries
fast: Tesla's Supercharger system, CHAdeMO, or Charge de Move, developed
by Japanese firms including carmakers Nissan and Mitsubishi, and GB/T in
China, the world's biggest electric car market.
"I think over time CHAdeMO and CCS converge, likely into the current CCS
standard, and the jury is out as to what will happen to Tesla," said
Pasquale Romano, chief executive officer of Silicon Valley-based
ChargePoint, which runs one of the world's largest charging station
networks.
So far, there are about 7,000 CCS charging points worldwide, according
to CharIN, with more than half in Europe. The European Union backs CCS
as the standard for fast-charging but does not prohibit other plugs
being installed.
That compares with 16,639 charge points compatible with CHAdeMO - most
in Japan and Europe - and 8,496 Tesla Superchargers, with the majority
in the United States. In China, there are 127,434 GB/T charging
stations, according to the China Electric Vehicle Charging
Infrastructure Promotion Alliance.
Just as in previous format wars such as the battle for videotape
dominance between VHS and Betamax, each charging standard has its pros
and cons.
Tesla's system is exclusive to its clients, for example, while CCS
features a double-plug that can charge DC and AC, increasing the number
of spots where drivers can recharge.
CHAdeMO, meanwhile, allows cars to sell power from their batteries back
to the grid, a process known as bi-directional charging that can help
stabilize energy networks in times of demand swings and earn car owners
some extra cash.
"If I were Nissan, I'd be wanting to take that standard and make it the
dominant one," said Gerard Reid, founder of Alexa Capital that advises
companies in the energy, technology and power infrastructure sectors.
[to top of second column] |
Electric car chargers are seen at the Holloway Road Shell station
where Shell is launching its first fast electric vehicle charging
station in London, Britain October 18, 2017. REUTERS/Mary
Turner/File Photo
"It creates a competitive advantage for them," he said.
TIME IS TIME
Most plugs used to charge cars at home use alternate current (AC) and are slow,
so building networks that can power vehicles fast when on the road is seen as
key by the industry, given many potential consumers still worry about battery
range.
Able to deliver more powerful direct current (DC), fast-chargers can load
electric cars up to seven times faster.
The fastest DC stations, capable of delivering up to 400 kilowatts, can recharge
cars within 10 minutes, a vast improvement on the 10-12 hours it can take to
reload at some AC charging points today.
Developers hope drivers will feel more confident about undertaking longer
journeys if they know they can reboot with a quick pit stop similar to stopping
at a petrol station.
With that in mind, the joint venture set up by the German carmakers and Ford to
install CCS fast-chargers has teamed up with companies that have service station
networks in Europe: Shell, OMV, Germany's Tank & Rast and retailer Circle K.
For traditional carmakers, getting ahead in the electric car race is also about
staying relevant in an industry that has been shaken up by Tesla.
Elon Musk's company is now worth $11 billion more than Ford, even though Tesla
delivered just 76,230 cars in 2016 while the U.S. car industry pioneer sold 6.65
million vehicles.
The German carmakers teaming up with Ford, however, believe their deeper pockets
should give them the upper hand in the long run and they see charging technology
as an important factor in the fight.
TIPPING POINT
For now, CCS, Supercharger and CHAdeMO plugs continue to be installed in Europe
as well as the United States, while China is pressing ahead with GB/T,
suggesting it is too early to call a winner in the plug wars - especially as no
carmaker will want to lose out on the Chinese market.
Tesla, for example, said in October it was modifying its Model S and Model X
cars for China to add a second charge port compatible with the country's GB/T
fast-charging standard.
Most other rivals are also incorporating the GB/T standard into their vehicles
for China, which has ambitious quotas for electric car sales, although some
industry officials still hope the country will adopt one of the other standards
at some point.
While sticking with developing its proprietary network for now, Tesla is a
member of the CHAdeMO and CharIN initiatives. It is also selling adapters so
owners of its cars in North America and Japan can use CHAdeMO charging stations.
Tesla declined to comment on whether it would consider joining a rival charging
standard at some point, a move analysts say could be a tipping point in the race
for plug dominance.
"For Tesla it was always very important to have a charging infrastructure for
our clients from the get-go," a spokeswoman said, adding that it welcomed all
investment in car charging.
Tomoko Blech, who represents CHAdeMO in Europe, said fussing over which standard
would prevail was not helpful given that the electric car industry was still in
its early days and carmakers should fight it out with their models.
Some also argue there will always be several ways to charge battery-powered
cars.
"If you drive a petrol car you can fuel it any place in the world. This is the
best you can get," said Nicolas Meilhan, principal analyst at consultancy Frost
& Sullivan.
"You will not get that for electric vehicles."
Graphic: Electric vehicle charging infrastructure in Europe - http://tmsnrt.rs/2DI0Yu6
Graphic: Electric cars' plug types - http://tmsnrt.rs/2DHVXSu
(Editing by David Clarke)
[© 2018 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2018 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. |