Plug wars: the battle for electric car
supremacy
Send a link to a friend
[January 24, 2018]
By Christoph Steitz
FRANKFURT (Reuters) - German carmakers hope
a network of high-power charging stations they are rolling out with Ford
will set an industry standard for plugs and protocols that will give
them an edge over electric car rivals.
At the moment, Tesla and carmakers in Japan and Germany use different
plugs and communication protocols to link batteries to chargers, but
firms building the charging networks needed for electric vehicles to
become mainstream say the number of plug formats will need to be limited
to keep costs down.
Carmakers behind the winning technology will benefit from having an
established supply chain and an extensive network, making their vehicles
potentially more attractive to customers worried about embarking upon
longer journeys, analysts say.
Manufacturers that back losing plugs, however, could end up with
redundant research and development and may have to invest to adapt
assembly lines and vehicle designs so their customers can use the most
widespread fast-charging networks.
Swiss bank UBS has estimated that $360 billion will need to be spent
over the next eight years to build global charging infrastructure to
keep pace with electric car sales, and it will be key to limit the
numerous technologies now in use.
"The quick-charging marketplace might be growing fast but the issue of
different types of connectivity and communication will need to be
resolved going forward," UBS said in a study published this month.
To try to build critical mass for the Combined Charging System (CCS)
favored by Europe, BMW, Mercedes-Benz maker Daimler, Ford and the
Volkswagen group, which includes Audi and Porsche, said in November they
would develop 400 high-power charging stations on main roads in 18
European countries by 2020.
"In the end, it is about safe-guarding investments for those that are
investing in electric mobility," said Claas Bracklo, head of
electromobility at BMW and the chairman of the Charging Interface
Initiative (CharIN), which is backing CCS.
"We have founded CharIN to build a position of power."
It is still early days for electric cars and difficult to predict which
plug technology will prevail or even whether there will always be
different ways to charge vehicles, unlike the one-size-fits-all nozzle
that can refill all petrol cars.
But there is a lot at stake for the carmakers ploughing billions of
dollars into the development of batteries and electric cars.
FORMAT WARS
Besides CCS, there are three other standards that will charge batteries
fast: Tesla's Supercharger system, CHAdeMO, or Charge de Move, developed
by Japanese firms including carmakers Nissan and Mitsubishi, and GB/T in
China, the world's biggest electric car market.
"I think over time CHAdeMO and CCS converge, likely into the current CCS
standard, and the jury is out as to what will happen to Tesla," said
Pasquale Romano, chief executive officer of Silicon Valley-based
ChargePoint, which runs one of the world's largest charging station
networks.
So far, there are about 7,000 CCS charging points worldwide, according
to CharIN, with more than half in Europe. The European Union backs CCS
as the standard for fast-charging but does not prohibit other plugs
being installed.
That compares with 16,639 charge points compatible with CHAdeMO - most
in Japan and Europe - and 8,496 Tesla Superchargers, with the majority
in the United States. In China, there are 127,434 GB/T charging
stations, according to the China Electric Vehicle Charging
Infrastructure Promotion Alliance.
Just as in previous format wars such as the battle for videotape
dominance between VHS and Betamax, each charging standard has its pros
and cons.
Tesla's system is exclusive to its clients, for example, while CCS
features a double-plug that can charge DC and AC, increasing the number
of spots where drivers can recharge.
CHAdeMO, meanwhile, allows cars to sell power from their batteries back
to the grid, a process known as bi-directional charging that can help
stabilize energy networks in times of demand swings and earn car owners
some extra cash.
"If I were Nissan, I'd be wanting to take that standard and make it the
dominant one," said Gerard Reid, founder of Alexa Capital that advises
companies in the energy, technology and power infrastructure sectors.
"It creates a competitive advantage for them," he said.
[to top of second column]
|
A Baojun E100 all-electric battery car is seen while it is being
charged in the parking lot in front of a Baojun NEV Experience
Center store in Liuzhou, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, China,
November 8, 2017. Picture taken November 8, 2017. REUTERS/Norihiko
Shirouzu/File Photo
TIME IS TIME
Most plugs used to charge cars at home use alternate current (AC)
and are slow, so building networks that can power vehicles fast when
on the road is seen as key by the industry, given many potential
consumers still worry about battery range.
Able to deliver more powerful direct current (DC), fast-chargers can
load electric cars up to seven times faster.
The fastest DC stations, capable of delivering up to 400 kilowatts,
can recharge cars within 10 minutes, a vast improvement on the 10-12
hours it can take to reload at some AC charging points today.
Developers hope drivers will feel more confident about undertaking
longer journeys if they know they can reboot with a quick pit stop
similar to stopping at a petrol station.
With that in mind, the joint venture set up by the German carmakers
and Ford to install CCS fast-chargers has teamed up with companies
that have service station networks in Europe: Shell, OMV, Germany's
Tank & Rast and retailer Circle K.
For traditional carmakers, getting ahead in the electric car race is
also about staying relevant in an industry that has been shaken up
by Tesla.
Elon Musk's company is now worth $11 billion more than Ford, even
though Tesla delivered just 76,230 cars in 2016 while the U.S. car
industry pioneer sold 6.65 million vehicles.
The German carmakers teaming up with Ford, however, believe their
deeper pockets should give them the upper hand in the long run and
they see charging technology as an important factor in the fight.
TIPPING POINT
For now, CCS, Supercharger and CHAdeMO plugs continue to be
installed in Europe as well as the United States, while China is
pressing ahead with GB/T, suggesting it is too early to call a
winner in the plug wars - especially as no carmaker will want to
lose out on the Chinese market.
Tesla, for example, said in October it was modifying its Model S and
Model X cars for China to add a second charge port compatible with
the country's GB/T fast-charging standard.
Most other rivals are also incorporating the GB/T standard into
their vehicles for China, which has ambitious quotas for electric
car sales, although some industry officials still hope the country
will adopt one of the other standards at some point.
While sticking with developing its proprietary network for now,
Tesla is a member of the CHAdeMO and CharIN initiatives. It is also
selling adapters so owners of its cars in North America and Japan
can use CHAdeMO charging stations.
Tesla declined to comment on whether it would consider joining a
rival charging standard at some point, a move analysts say could be
a tipping point in the race for plug dominance.
"For Tesla it was always very important to have a charging
infrastructure for our clients from the get-go," a spokeswoman said,
adding that it welcomed all investment in car charging.
Tomoko Blech, who represents CHAdeMO in Europe, said fussing over
which standard would prevail was not helpful given that the electric
car industry was still in its early days and carmakers should fight
it out with their models.
Some also argue there will always be several ways to charge
battery-powered cars.
"If you drive a petrol car you can fuel it any place in the world.
This is the best you can get," said Nicolas Meilhan, principal
analyst at consultancy Frost & Sullivan.
"You will not get that for electric vehicles."
(Editing by David Clarke)
[© 2018 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
Copyright 2018 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
|