|
 "We estimate that about 14 percent of diabetes in the world occurs
because of higher levels of air pollution, that's one in seven
cases," said senior study author Dr. Ziyad Al-Aly of Washington
University and the VA Saint Louis Health Care System in Missouri.
"Risks exist at levels that are below what's now currently
considered safe by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in the
United States and also by the World Health Organization," he told
Reuters Health in a phone interview.
The tiniest form of particulate matter pollution, known as PM 2.5,
is already associated with increased risk of heart disease, lung
disease, kidney disease, and other noncommunicable diseases "and
contributed to about 4.2 million premature deaths in 2015," the
study team writes in The Lancet Planetary Health.
PM 2.5 is the mix of solid fragments and liquid droplets suspended
in air that's sometimes visible to human eyes as haze.
"There is emerging evidence over the past several years that
particulates, when they are small enough, they make their way
through the lungs to the blood vessels," Al-Aly said. "They go to
the liver, they go to the pancreas, they go to the kidneys. These
particles are noxious. They irritate tissue and they damage tissue,
they create oxidative stress, they create inflammation."
Type 2 diabetes is associated with obesity and aging and occurs when
the pancreas can't make or process enough of the hormone insulin.
To look for a link between air pollution and type 2 diabetes,
researchers analyzed data on 1.7 million U.S. veterans without
diabetes, comparing PM 2.5 levels where they lived to their risk of
being newly diagnosed with the disease during the next eight and a
half years, on average. The researchers separated out the
independent effect of air pollution by taking other diabetes risk
factors, like obesity, into account.
Veterans' annual average daily PM 2.5 exposure ranged from 5 to 22.1
micrograms per cubic meter (mcg/m3) of air. A 10-point increase in
PM 2.5 concentration was associated with a 15 percent higher risk of
developing diabetes, and an 8 percent higher risk of death. Risk of
diabetes started to rise when pollution levels exceeded 2.4 mcg/m3,
well below the EPA's current standard of 12 mcg/m3 and the World
Health Organization guideline of 10 mcg/m3.
[to top of second column] |
Al-Aly and his colleagues then looked at worldwide PM 2.5 levels to
estimate the total burden of diabetes due to air pollution. About
3.2 million new cases of diabetes, 8.2 million years of life lost to
disability and more than 200,000 deaths annually were attributable
to breathing dirty air, the authors calculated. Low-income and
low-to-middle income countries bore the largest burden of air
pollution-related diabetes.
While air in the U.S. is relatively clean compared to smog-choked
parts of China, India and elsewhere, Al-Aly said, "we need to do
better."
He called for moving to "energy sources that contribute much less to
pollution, more electric cars, more hybrid cars, more solar power
and wind sources of energy rather than coal. It's already happening,
but probably not fast enough."
In an editorial, Dr. Gary O'Donovan of the Universidad de los Andes
in Bogota, Colombia, and Dr. Carlos Cadena-Gaitan of the Universidad
EAFIT in Medellin, call the findings "another call for action." They
note that the current study did not adjust for physical activity,
and that it's possible to cut air pollution while promoting exercise
with programs like Bogota's Cyclovia, in which city roads are closed
to motor vehicles on Sundays and holidays to make room for walkers
and cyclists.
"More research is required to determine the independent associations
of physical activity and air pollution with diabetes and other
non-communicable diseases; nonetheless, there is more than enough
evidence to justify the implementation of policies and interventions
that might actually increase physical activity and decrease air
pollution, such as Cyclovias, free sport and exercise facilities,
bicycle sharing schemes, electric vehicles, low sulfur fuels,
exhaust filters, and driving prohibition schemes," they write.
SOURCE: https://bit.ly/2zc5NgW and https://bit.ly/2lJERLF The Lancet
Planetary Health, online June 29, 2018.
[© 2018 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2018 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |
