As tariffs strike, China blames U.S. for
'largest-scale trade war'
Send a link to a friend
[July 06, 2018]
By Michael Martina and David Lawder
BEIJING/WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The United
States and China slapped tit-for-tat duties on $34 billion worth of the
other's imports on Friday, with Beijing accusing Washington of
triggering the "largest-scale trade war" as the world's two biggest
economies sharply escalated their conflict.
Hours before Washington's deadline for the tariffs to take effect, U.S.
President Donald Trump upped the ante, warning that the United States
may ultimately target over $500 billion worth of Chinese goods, or
roughly the total amount of U.S. imports from China last year.
China's commerce ministry, in a statement shortly after the U.S.
deadline passed at 0401 GMT on Friday, said that it was forced to
retaliate, meaning imported U.S. goods including cars, soybeans, and
lobsters also faced 25 percent tariffs.
China's soymeal futures fell more than 2 percent on Friday afternoon
before recovering most of those losses, amid initial market confusion
over whether Beijing had actually implemented the tariffs, which it
later confirmed it had.
"We can probably say that the trade war has officially started," said
Chen Feixiang, professor of applied economics at Shanghai Jiaotong
University's Antai Colege of Economics and Management.
"If this ends at $34 billion, it will have a marginal effect on both
economies, but if it escalates to $500 billion like Trump said then it's
going to have a big impact for both countries," Chen said.
Friday's long-expected tariff volley fueled fear that a prolonged and
escalating battle would deal a blow to global trade, investment and
growth, while also damaging U.S. farmers who stand to lose revenues and
potentially driving up food prices in China.
In the run-up to Friday, there was no sign of renewed negotiations
between U.S. and Chinese officials, business sources in Washington and
Beijing said.
"Our baseline forecast assumes only a modest further escalation in the
trade 'war' this summer," Bank of America Merrill Lynch said in a Friday
note.
"However, we can't rule out a full-blown, recession-inducing 'trade
war'," it said.
The dispute has roiled financial markets including stocks, currencies
and the global trade of commodities from soybeans to coal in recent
weeks.
Chinese shares, battered in the run-up to the tariff deadline, reversed
earlier losses to close higher, but the yuan remained weaker against the
dollar. Asian equities wobbled but also managed to end up.
PRICE WATCH
Importers of American retail goods hit by higher Chinese duties were
reluctant to pass the costs on to consumers for now.
An analysis of over four dozen targeted U.S products showed that prices
were little changed on Friday afternoon from earlier in the week. The
products, all sold on Chinese e-commerce platforms, ranged from pet food
to mixed nuts and whiskey.
Ford Motor Co said on Thursday that for now, it will not hike prices of
imported Ford and higher-margin luxury Lincoln models in China.
Some Chinese ports had delayed clearing goods from the United States,
four sources said on Friday. There did not appear to be any direct
instructions to hold up cargoes, but some customs departments were
waiting for official guidance on imposing added tariffs, the sources
said.
[to top of second column]
|
President Donald Trump gestures during a Make America Great Again
rally in Great Falls, Montana, U.S., July 5, 2018. REUTERS/Joshua
Roberts
While Chinese state media have slammed Trump's trade policies and on
Friday likened his administration to a "gang of hoodlums," the simmering
conflict has gained little traction on China's tightly controlled social
media, not cracking the 50 top-searched topics on the Twitter-like Weibo
platform.
'GANG OF HOODLUMS'
China's commerce ministry called the U.S. actions "a violation of world
trade rules" and said that it had "initiated the largest-scale trade war
in economic history."
Trump has railed against Beijing for intellectual property theft and
barriers to entry for U.S. businesses and a $375 billion U.S. trade
deficit with China.
"You have another 16 (billion dollars) in two weeks, and then, as you
know, we have $200 billion in abeyance and then after the $200 billion,
we have $300 billion in abeyance. Ok? So we have 50 plus 200 plus almost
300," Trump told reporters aboard Air Force One on Thursday.
Throughout the escalating conflict, China has sought to take the high
road, positioning itself as a champion of free trade, but state media
ramped-up criticism of Trump on Friday.
"In effect, the Trump administration is behaving like a gang of hoodlums
with its shakedown of other countries, particularly China," the
state-run China Daily newspaper said in an English language editorial on
Friday.
"Its unruliness looks set to have a profoundly damaging impact on the
global economic landscape in the coming decades, unless countries stand
together to oppose it."
A China central bank adviser said the planned U.S. import tariffs on $50
billion worth of Chinese goods - $34 billion plus a planned follow-on
list worth $16 billion - will cut China's economic growth by 0.2
percentage points, the official Xinhua news agency reported Friday.
China's tariff list is heavy on agricultural goods such as soybeans,
sorghum and cotton, threatening U.S. farmers in states that backed Trump
in the 2016 U.S. election, such as Texas and Iowa.
"This is not economic Armageddon. We will not have to hunt our food with
pointy sticks," Rob Carnell, chief Asia economist at ING, said in a
note.
"But it is applying the brakes to a global economy that has less durable
momentum than appears to be the case."
(Reporting by Adam Jourdan in SHANGHAI, Michael Martina, Christian
Shepherd, Dominique Patton, Elias Glenn and Josephine Mason in BEIJING,
David Lawder and Jeff Mason WASHINGTON; Writing by Tony Munroe; Editing
by Sam Holmes & Shri Navaratnam)
[© 2018 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
Copyright 2018 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |