U.S. judge allows lawsuits over Monsanto's Roundup to
proceed to trial
Send a link to a friend
[July 11, 2018]
By Tina Bellon
(Reuters) - Hundreds of lawsuits against
Monsanto Co by cancer survivors or families of those who died can
proceed to trial, a federal judge ruled on Tuesday, finding there was
sufficient evidence for a jury to hear the cases that blame the
company's glyphosate-containing weed-killer for the disease.
The decision by U.S. District Judge Vince Chhabria in San Francisco
followed years of litigation and weeks of hearings about the
controversial science surrounding the safety of the chemical glyphosate,
the key ingredient in Monsanto's top-selling weed-killer.
Monsanto is now a unit of Bayer AG <BAYGn.DE>, following a $62.5 billion
takeover of the U.S. seed major which closed in June.
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency last September concluded
glyphosate is likely not carcinogenic to humans. But the World Health
Organization in 2015 classified glyphosate as "probably carcinogenic to
humans."
Chhabria called the plaintiffs' expert opinions "shaky" and entirely
excluded the opinions of two scientists. But he said a reasonable jury
could conclude, based on the findings of four experts he allowed, that
glyphosate can cause cancer in humans.
The plaintiffs will next have to prove Roundup caused cancer in specific
people whose cases will be selected for test trials, a phase Chhabria in
his Tuesday opinion called a "daunting challenge."
Lawsuits by more than 400 farmers, landscapers and consumers who claim
Roundup caused them to develop non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma, a type of blood
cell cancer, have been consolidated before Chhabria.
[to top of second column] |
Monsanto's Roundup weedkiller atomizers are displayed for sale at a
garden shop near Brussels, Belgium November 27, 2017. REUTERS/Yves
Herman
Monsanto denies the allegations and in a statement said it would continue to
defend the lawsuits with evidence proving there is "absolutely no connection
between glyphosate and cancer." The company said its position was supported by
more than 800 scientific studies and reviews.
The company had told Chhabria in March that none of the plaintiffs' experts
satisfied scientific or legal requirements for admissibility and urged the judge
to dismiss the cases.
Aimee Wagstaff, one of the lawyers representing the people suing the company, in
a statement said she was pleased her clients will have their day in court. "It's
time to hold Monsanto accountable for putting this dangerous product on the
market," Wagstaff said.
Monsanto faces 5,000 lawsuits nationwide alleging Roundup caused cancer, mainly
in state courts.
While Chhabria's ruling is not binding on them, state court judges have been
closely following the federal litigation and expert hearings. The California
state judge who handles the most Roundup cases posted to her docket that she was
attending the hearings before Chhabria in March.
(Reporting by Tina Bellon; Editing by Frances Kerry, Marguerita Choy and David
Gregorio)
[© 2018 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2018 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content.
|