Exclusive: After discouraging year, U.S.
officials expect review of Afghan strategy
Send a link to a friend
[July 11, 2018]
By Idrees Ali and Jonathan Landay
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The United States is
preparing to undertake a review of its strategy in Afghanistan, U.S.
officials told Reuters, a year after President Donald Trump begrudgingly
agreed to extend America's involvement in the 17-year-old war.
Officials said Trump has shown signs of frustration over the lack of
progress since he unveiled a strategy last August that committed to an
open-ended deployment of U.S. military advisers, trainers and special
forces and increased air support for Afghan security forces. The goal
was to force the Taliban militants to open peace talks with the Kabul
government.
Trump was opposed to remaining in America's longest war, but was
convinced by his advisers to give it more time. He authorized last year
the deployment an additional 3,000 U.S. troops, bringing the total to
around 15,000.
Nearly a year later, the current situation is in a stalemate in which
Afghan civilians are paying a heavy toll, the Taliban are expanding in
rural areas but are unable to capture major urban centers and the
capability of Afghan security forces remains in doubt.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b6c6f/b6c6fb8901252841889f89d8733b0be75b8f5e49" alt=""
Several current U.S. officials and other former officials and advisers
with direct knowledge said the White House had not yet formally ordered
the review, but they were preparing for a government-wide appraisal in
the next few months.
The officials spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not
authorized to publicly discuss the issue.
"We've received some indications from the White House that Trump could
ask for a review in the next few months. So we're preparing for what it
would look like," said a senior U.S. official.
The review would examine all facets of the current strategy, including
what progress had been made, the U.S. troops presence, and prospect of
negotiations with the Taliban. It also would include U.S. relations with
Pakistan, which U.S. officials accuse of supporting the insurgents, the
senior official said. Islamabad denies the charge.
"We regularly conduct reviews of our strategies examining their
effectiveness and making necessary adjustments to ensure U.S. resources
are being used in the most efficient ways possible," a National Security
Council spokesperson said in an emailed response to a request for
comment. "We are not planning an overarching review of our core
strategy, like the one conducted last summer."The official did not
define "an overarching review of our core strategy," but added as Trump
arrived in Brussels for a NATO summit that, "We expect allies and
partners to carry their fair share of the burden in Afghanistan by
continuing to increase troop and financial contributions."
[to top of second column]
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6bf97/6bf970cf9f4456bc83be0711027663c09991e061" alt=""
Afghan President Ashraf Ghani accompanied by U.S. Secretary of State
Mike Pompeo speaks at a news conference at the Presidential Palace
in Kabul, Afghanistan, July 9, 2018. Andrew Harnik/Pool via Reuters
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2bd1d/2bd1d6c938875ab7fb8f9875f6ded8cca70b5368" alt=""
LONGEST WAR
U.S.-led forces invaded Afghanistan in 2001 to topple the Taliban
government for harboring al-Qaeda.
Since then, nearly 1,900 U.S. troops have been killed in the war,
even as corruption remains endemic in the country and security
remains precarious. A recent U.S. government watchdog report found
that the Afghan government controlled or influenced only 56 percent
of country.
Trump has vented over the lack of progress in Afghanistan, other
officials told Reuters, also on the condition of anonymity.
"The president has asked repeatedly what progress we've made in
Afghanistan since he made his decision, and how much we've invested
there since 2001," said one senior official with first-hand
knowledge of the ongoing debate over Afghan policy.
"He’s voiced his frustration about the lack of progress many, many
times, basically asking 'What have we got for all that money?'"
Michael Kugelman, a South Asia specialist at the Woodrow Wilson
Center, said that if there had meaningful progress in Afghanistan, a
review would be unlikely.
"The administration could essentially say (after the review) that
the conditions have not improved on the ground, so what is the
reason to stay," Kugelman said.
It is not unprecedented for the White House to request such an
internal review. Officials said a similar review was carried out
after President Barack Obama unveiled an Afghanistan strategy in
2009.
U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, on a surprise visit to
Afghanistan on Monday, promised support for President Ashraf Ghani's
bid to start peace talks with the Taliban and repeated the United
States would be willing to take part.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1aae0/1aae07902abb38a03198316638aa5f64b1ce1311" alt=""
He said the strategy announced last year was working, and would
reassure Afghans "that we will support them as they continue
fighting to liberate their country and their people."
(Reporting by Idrees Ali and Jonathan Landay; Editing by Mary
Milliken, Alistair Bell and Lisa Shumaker)
[© 2018 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
Copyright 2018 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |