As Trump amps up trade war, China plays
nice with foreign investors
Send a link to a friend
[July 12, 2018]
By Michael Martina
BEIJING (Reuters) - Long accused of
protectionist tactics that make it a difficult place for foreign firms
to operate, China is trying to reverse that narrative amid an escalating
trade war with the United States, green-lighting huge investments and
portraying itself as a champion of openness.
But critics argue that despite its attempt to claim the moral high
ground as U.S. President Donald Trump threatens to apply more tariffs on
Chinese imports, Beijing's recent moves to make it easier for foreign
businesses to set up operations also effectively acknowledges that it
has had discriminatory market barriers.
This week, China agreed to a $10 billion petrochemicals project by
Germany's BASF <BASFn.DE> that will be the first such plant in China
that is wholly foreign-owned, not a joint venture.
It also approved a huge new wholly-owned Shanghai factory for U.S.
electric car maker Tesla Inc <TSLA.O>, and a $2.3 billion joint venture
organic light-emitting diode (OLED) plant to be built by South Korea's
LG Display Co Ltd <034220.KS>.
Responding to the Trump administration's latest plan to slap 10 percent
tariffs on an extra $200 billion worth of Chinese imports, Assistant
Commerce Minister Li Chenggang said on Wednesday that China would not
close itself to U.S. business.
"I want to stress that the Chinese government's attitude to support
business cooperation between the two countries will not change, its
determination to push forward reforms and improve the business
environment will not change, and its stance of opposing unilateralism
and supporting multilateralism will not change," Li said at a business
forum in Beijing on Wednesday.
“They go low, we go high," he said, in an apparent jab at Trump as he
borrowed a phrase used by former U.S. First Lady Michelle Obama in the
2016 U.S. election campaign.
The recent investment announcements came as Premier Li Keqiang this week
visited Germany. The two countries signed commercial accords worth 20
billion euros ($23.5 billion), including the BASF agreement.
Chinese state media framed such cooperation in the context of the
increasingly bitter trade dispute with Washington.
"The trade war should push China and the EU to cherish mutual
cooperation, because this increasingly scarce cooperation is becoming
more valuable," China's nationalist tabloid, the Global Times, said in
an editorial on Wednesday.
'PROMISE FATIGUE'
As the threats in the trade dispute have increased, so too have signals
from Beijing that it means to follow through on reforms. Chinese
officials insist there is no link, and that it will open up at its own
pace. Rising costs are also frustrating to foreign manufacturers in
China.
In recent weeks, China has issued a shorter list of areas closed to
foreign investment, and committed to easing or eliminating foreign
equity caps in sectors that include banking, insurance, securities, the
auto industry, as well as in shipbuilding and aerospace.
But the string of announcements come at a time when there has been
slowing foreign investment into China and more vociferous complaints
about Beijing's market barriers and the difficulty of doing business in
the world's second-largest economy.
And Beijing is still holding up at least one major takeover involving
foreign companies - U.S. chipmaker Qualcomm Inc's <QCOM.O> deal to buy
Netherlands-based NXP Semiconductors NV <NXPL.O>. That has been waiting
approval from China's antitrust regulator for months, leading to
speculation among investors that the deal is being held hostage to the
trade dispute with Washington.
[to top of second column]
|
German Chancellor Angela Merkel and Chinese Premier Li Keqiang
arrive to the German-Chinese Forum for economic cooperation in
Berlin, Germany July 9, 2018. REUTERS/Fabrizio Bensch/File Photo
Years of lackluster follow-through by China on its reform pledges
has left what many in the foreign business community call "promise
fatigue".
Business leaders have been warning that if China didn't take real
measures to address a lack of reciprocal market openness, it would
sow retaliatory sentiment among its largest trading partners. And
trade hardliners, particularly in the United States, had argued that
Beijing would not make good on its pledges until other countries
began imposing costs upon Beijing.
European Union Chamber of Commerce in China President Mats Harborn
on Tuesday called Trump's tariffs the "sledgehammer approach", but
said the root cause of what China has termed the "largest-scale
trade war" in economic history began in China.
"The reason we are where we are is because the Chinese leadership
did not proceed as quickly as we wanted as a trade community,"
Harborn told a news briefing.
Some in the U.S. business community, while rueing the damage caused
by Trump's tariffs, privately say Beijing's recent emphasis on
accelerating reforms may not be a coincidence.
"Tariffs are biting. The Chinese are less confident internally than
externally. They have never been tested this way," a U.S. industry
source told Reuters, asking to not be named given the sensitivity of
the matter.
Beijing has begun downplaying Made in China 2025, the state-backed
industrial policy that has provoked alarm in the West and is core to
Washington's complaints about the country's unfair trade practices.
Propaganda authorities have also issued unusually strict rules
limiting local media coverage of the trade war because of worries
that unrestrained reporting could set off panic and roil its already
jittery financial markets, sources within Chinese state media have
said.
And European officials have said Beijing is trying to woo the EU
with market access in return for standing with China against Trump's
trade measures, though the Europeans, who share U.S. criticism of
China but disapprove of Trump's tariffs, have largely refrained from
taking sides.
"By committing themselves to further openness. I think China hopes
it can minimize the departure out of China of multinational firms,"
said Louis Kuijs, Hong Kong-based head of Asia Economics at Oxford
Economics.
(Reporting by Michael Martina; Additional reporting by Elias Glenn
and Stella Qiu; Editing by Tony Munroe and Martin Howell)
[© 2018 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
Copyright 2018 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content.
|