U.S. District Judge David Ezra, who had temporary halted the law,
said he wanted to keep the hearing in the Texas capital, Austin,
from being influenced by speculation that a new U.S. Supreme Court
justice to replace the retiring Anthony Kennedy could alter national
abortion law.
Ezra, appointed by former Republican President Ronald Reagan, said
it would be "folly and a great deal of injustice" to base a decision
on what the Supreme Court may eventually decide on abortion.
Republicans are hoping the Senate will confirm Brett Kavanaugh, a
conservative U.S. appeals court judge nominated by President Donald
Trump to fill the Supreme Court vacancy, before the court's next
term opens in October.
Abortion rights advocates worry that Kavanaugh, whose previous
judicial record on abortion cases is thin, could change the balance
on the Supreme Court in favor of more restrictions, or even help
overturn the court's landmark 1973 Roe v. Wade decision that
legalized abortion.
Legal battles are developing over state laws restricting abortion,
including the one in Texas and another in Arkansas that effectively
bans medication-induced abortions.
In June 2017, Republican Texas Governor Greg Abbott signed abortion
restrictions into law that included the requirement on disposal of
fetal tissue. Prior regulations called for the tissue to be disposed
in the same manner as other human tissue, which is typically through
incineration and disposal in a sanitary landfill.
"It is for the dignified disposal of fetal remains and nothing
more," Darren McCarty, representing Texas, said in opening
statements.
[to top of second column] |
But Texas has a record of imposing restrictions on abortion that
courts have ruled were aimed at shuttering clinics or placing an
undue burden on women seeking the procedure.
Texas began crafting its regulations on fetal tissue disposal in
2016, shortly after it suffered a stinging defeat in the U.S.
Supreme Court that struck down other abortion restrictions approved
by lawmakers in the most populous Republican-controlled state.
Lawyers for the plaintiffs, who include abortion providers, said
women could already seek burial or cremation of fetal tissue under
current state law.
They said the law placed an arbitrary burden on women's beliefs by
requiring a burial ritual and could place providers under threat of
closure if they cannot find ways to abide by the measure.
"The act provides no added benefit to Texas women," David Brown, a
lawyer for the plaintiffs, said in opening statements.
Other states with similar laws on fetal tissue disposal are
Arkansas, Louisiana and Indiana, according to the Guttmacher
Institute, which monitors abortion laws.
Courts have blocked the fetal tissue laws in those states.
(Reporting by Jon Herskovitz; Editing by Frank McGurty and Peter
Cooney)
[© 2018 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2018 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |