States sue U.S. to void state and local
tax deduction cap
Send a link to a friend
[July 18, 2018]
By Jonathan Stempel
NEW YORK (Reuters) - Four U.S. states sued
the federal government on Tuesday to void the new $10,000 cap on federal
deductions for state and local taxes included in President Donald
Trump's 2017 tax overhaul.
The lawsuit by New York, Connecticut, Maryland and New Jersey came seven
months after Trump signed the $1.5 trillion overhaul passed by the
Republican-led Congress, which cut taxes for wealthy Americans and
slashed the corporate tax rate.
Critics have said the cap would disproportionately harm "blue" states
that tilt Democratic.
Tuesday's lawsuit adds to the many legal battles between such states,
including several with high taxes, and the Trump administration, which
was accused of unconstitutionally intruding on state sovereignty by
imposing the cap.
"The federal government is hell-bent on using New York as a piggy bank
to pay for corporate tax cuts and I will not stand for it," said Andrew
Cuomo, New York's Democratic governor.
A spokeswoman for the Department of the Treasury said that agency was
reviewing the complaint. The department, Treasury Secretary Steven
Mnuchin and the Internal Revenue Service are among the defendants.
Taxpayers have long typically enjoyed unlimited federal deductions for
state and local taxes, known as SALT deductions.
Under the cap, individuals and married taxpayers filing jointly who
itemize deductions may deduct only up to $10,000 annually for state and
local income, property and sales taxes.
The four states said the cap will depress home prices, spending, job
creation and economic growth, and impede their ability to pay for
essential services such as schools, hospitals, police, and road and
bridge construction and maintenance.
According to the Tax Foundation, the four states and California, which
all favored Democrat Hillary Clinton in the 2016 presidential election,
may be particularly hard hit, based on SALT deductions as a percentage
of adjusted gross income.
New Yorkers claimed an average $22,169 SALT deduction in 2015, the Tax
Policy Center said.
[to top of second column]
|
New York Governor Andrew Cuomo speaks during an announcement in New
York City, U.S., August 17, 2017. REUTERS/Brendan McDermid
UPHILL BATTLE
David Gamage, an Indiana University tax law professor, said the
lawsuit faces an uphill battle, despite suggesting that keeping the
SALT deduction was a factor when states in 1913 gave Congress power
to levy income taxes through the 16th Amendment.
"I think it's very unlikely that it succeeds," he said. "The Supreme
Court has generally given Congress wide latitude in carrying out its
taxing power, especially in setting deductions. It would be a pretty
dramatic change of direction to allow this lawsuit."
In the complaint filed with the U.S. District Court in Manhattan,
the four states said a $10,000 cap "effectively eviscerates" a
deduction that has been on the books since 1861.
They also said it will force New York taxpayers alone to pay $14.3
billion more in federal taxes this year, and another $121 billion
through 2025, when the cap is scheduled to expire.
By imposing the cap, Congress was able to "exert a power akin to
undue influence" over states by interfering with their authority to
decide taxes and fiscal policy, the lawsuit said, quoting Supreme
Court Chief Justice John Roberts.
In May, the Treasury Department said it would propose regulations to
stop states from circumventing the cap.
New York, Connecticut and New Jersey had already adopted
"workarounds" letting taxpayers fund municipal services by paying
into specified funds, and claiming deductible charitable
contributions.
The case is New York et al v Mnuchin et al, U.S. District Court,
Southern District of New York, No. 18-06427.
(Reporting by Jonathan Stempel in New York; Additional reporting by
Jason Lange in Washington; Editing by Susan Thomas and James
Dalgleish)
[© 2018 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
Copyright 2018 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |