U.S. loses bid to end children's climate
change lawsuit
Send a link to a friend
[July 21, 2018]
By Jonathan Stempel
(Reuters) - A federal appeals court in San
Francisco on Friday rejected the Trump administration's renewed bid to
dismiss a lawsuit by young activists who say the U.S. government is
ignoring the perils of climate change.
By a 3-0 vote, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals said the government
fell short of the "high bar" needed to dismiss the Oregon case,
originally brought in 2015 against the administration of President
Barack Obama.
Twenty-one children and young adults, ages 11 to 22, accused federal
officials and oil industry executives of violating their due process
rights by knowing for decades that carbon pollution poisons the
environment, but doing nothing about it.
The government contended that letting the case proceed would be too
burdensome, unconstitutionally pit the courts against the executive
branch, and require improper "agency decision-making" by forcing
officials to answer questions about climate change.
But the appeals court said the issues raised "are better addressed
through the ordinary course of litigation."
A trial is scheduled for Oct. 29 in the federal court in Eugene, Oregon.
President Donald Trump's administration also has asked the U.S. Supreme
Court to dismiss the lawsuit or put it on hold, and is awaiting a
ruling. Its earlier bid to end the lawsuit failed in March.
[to top of second column]
|
President Donald Trump refers to amounts of temperature change as he
announces his decision that the United States will withdraw from the
landmark Paris Climate Agreement, at the White House in Washington,
U.S., June 1, 2017. REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque/File Photo
A spokesman for the U.S. Department of Justice declined to comment.
The activists are seeking various environmental remedies.
Julia Olson, one of their lawyers, said in a phone interview, "The
9th Circuit sees that this case needs to go to trial with a full
factual record on the young plaintiffs' harms, their constitutional
rights and climate science."
The case is U.S. et al v U.S. District Court for the District of
Oregon, Eugene, 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. No. 18-71928.
(Reporting by Jonathan Stempel in New York; Editing by Jonathan
Oatis and Will Dunham)
[© 2018 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
Copyright 2018 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content.
|