Four in five children's snacks and treats had at least 10 percent of
calories from sugars - gluten-free or not - the study found.
And 88 percent of gluten-free packaged foods for kids had poor
nutritional quality because they contained too much sugar, salt,
total fat, saturated fat and trans-fatty acids - as did 97 percent
of items that made no claims about lacking gluten.
"The problem is NOT the gluten free label per se, it is the
processed foods aimed at children," said study author Charlene
Elliott, a food marketing and children's health researcher at the
University of Calgary in Canada.
In fact, when researchers compared gluten-free products to similar
items containing gluten, the nutritional content was similarly poor,
Elliott said. Gluten-free versions of boxed macaroni and cheese, for
example, had sky-high levels of sugars and unhealthy fats just like
the box without a gluten-free label.
"Some parents opt for a gluten-free diet as they believe it will be
healthier for their children," Elliott said by email. "But when you
look at the nutritional profile of packaged gluten-free foods, this
is not the case."
About one in 100 children and adults have celiac disease, in which
consumption of gluten triggers an autoimmune response that damages
the small intestine and interferes with the absorption of nutrients.
Avoiding foods that contain gluten from grains such as barley, malt,
rye and wheat, or their derivatives, can ease symptoms and help
minimize the risk of complications like malnutrition and brittle
bones.
A growing number of families are going gluten-free even when nobody
in the household has celiac disease or gluten intolerance out of a
mistaken belief that this is a healthier way to eat, researchers
note in Pediatrics.
For the study, researchers examined the nutritional content of 66
packaged children's foods labeled as gluten free and 308 processed
products that didn't make this claim.
Where possible, they made apples-to-apples comparisons to match
similar products like instant oatmeal, ice cream, granola bars,
peanut butter, and applesauce or fruit snacks.
The study wasn't a controlled experiment designed to prove whether
or how gluten-free products might be healthier than other processed
foods. Another limitation is that researchers only looked at items
available for sale at two large grocery chains.
[to top of second column] |
And the study didn't look at what should be the staples of a
gluten-free diet: vegetables, fruits, lean protein and other whole
foods that are naturally lacking in gluten.
"There are many very nutrient dense, whole, gluten-free grains such
as amaranth, millet, quinoa, buckwheat," said Marion Groetch, a
nutrition and food allergy expert at the Icahn School of Medicine at
Mount Sinai in New York City.
"But most gluten-free products are made from rice, corn or potato
starch and therefore are even less nutritious than processed
products containing wheat," Groetch, who wasn't involved in the
study, said by email. "These products hence are lower in fiber,
micronutrients, and typically higher in fat and sugar."
There's also a difference between kids having an occasional snack of
packaged gluten-free foods and eating these items three meals a day,
said Steve Taylor, a food allergy researcher at the University of
Nebraska-Lincoln who wasn't involved in the study.
"In my view, you need to look at the overall diet to get a good
picture of the healthiness of the child's diet," Taylor said by
email. "Many kids eat high-sugar foods on occasion but burn off that
energy and also eat an overall healthy diet."
No matter what type of diet families follow, parents should still
try to avoid packaged or processed items as much as possible, said
Samantha Heller, a nutritionist at New York University Langone
Medical Center who wasn't involved in the study.
"Grocery store shelves are now overflowing with gluten-free foods
that are just as junky as their gluten containing counterparts,"
Heller said by email. "Parents should focus on more whole, home made
and home cooked foods whether gluten-free or not."
SOURCE: http://bit.ly/2LzAXna Pediatrics, online July 23, 2018.
[© 2018 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2018 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |