Trump wants $12 billion in aid to U.S.
farmers suffering from trade war
Send a link to a friend
[July 25, 2018]
By David Shepardson and Steve Holland
WASHINGTON/KANSAS CITY, Mo. (Reuters) - The
Trump administration on Tuesday said it will use a Great Depression-era
program to pay up to $12 billion to help U.S. farmers weather a growing
trade war with China, the European Union and others that the president
began.
It is a clear signal the U.S. President Donald Trump is determined to
stick with tariffs as his weapon of choice in the conflict.
The move meant to cushion the blow for a politically important
constituency was met with broad criticism by many farmers and farm-belt
lawmakers, including Republicans. Rural and agricultural states
supported Trump by wide margins in the 2016 election.
Trump's trade policies have become central in several rural-state U.S.
Senate races ahead of congressional elections in November.
The president, speaking at an event in Kansas City on Tuesday,
reaffirmed his support for tariffs and pledged that "farmers will be the
biggest beneficiary."
"Just be a little patient," Trump said.
The relief package is intended as a temporary boost to farmers as the
United States and China negotiate over trade issues, officials said.
"This obviously is a short-term solution that will give President Trump
time to work on a long-term trade policy," said Sonny Perdue, the
secretary of the U.S. Department of Agriculture.
The aid will be financed through the USDA's Commodity Credit Corporation
and will not require congressional approval, Perdue said.
The administration's action appeared to divide Republicans, with some
praising the move and others troubled by what they view as the kind of
widespread government-assistance program their party has traditionally
opposed.
"This trade war is cutting the legs out from under farmers and the White
House's 'plan' is to spend $12 billion on gold crutches," said Senator
Ben Sasse, of Nebraska who frequently criticizes the president, a fellow
Republican.
SHORT-TERM BOOST?
Farmers have been a particular target in the current clash over trade
policy as other countries seek to retaliate for Trump's duties on
Chinese goods as well as on steel and aluminum imports from the European
Union, Canada and Mexico. Those affected economies have in turn targeted
U.S. agricultural products, including soybeans, dairy, meat, produce and
liquor.
The United States exported $138 billion in agriculture products in 2017,
including $21.5 billion of soybeans, the most valuable export. China
alone imported $12.3 billion of U.S. soybeans last year, according to
the USDA.
The size of the direct payments to farmers as a result of trade
shortfalls would be unprecedented, said Scott Irwin, an agricultural
economist at the University of Illinois.
"We have never compensated farmers directly on such a large scale for
retaliatory tariffs," Irwin said.
The news lifted shares of farm equipment companies on the prospect that
farmers will have more money to spend on tractors and other farm gear.
Deere & Co jumped 3.1 percent, while Caterpillar Inc gained more than 1
percent and AGCO Corp rose 0.6 percent.
[to top of second column]
|
President Donald Trump walks up the driveway prior to delivering
remarks at a showcase of American-made products at the White House
in Washington, U.S., July 23, 2018. REUTERS/Carlos Barria
Stock options trading in Deere and Caterpillar also saw a burst of
activity in the 30 minutes before the news broke, according to a
Reuters analysis of Trade Alert data. Some of those contracts more
than doubled in price after word of the pending plan broke in a
Politico report.
Options activity has been known to spike before the public
announcement of market-moving news and the U.S. Securities and
Exchange Commission has pursued enforcement actions when the
activity has been determined to be insider trading involving
options. There was no immediate indication that Tuesday's volume
increases were anything other than coincidental.
Soybean futures <0#S:>, driven to a 10-year low in part by China's
retaliatory tariffs, rose 1.2 percent and hit their highest in two
weeks as traders bet farm aid would improve demand, reducing a
current surplus supply.
Still, Blake Hurst, a corn and soybean farmer and president of the
Missouri Farm Bureau, said that unless the White House's policies
change, the U.S. agriculture industry will continue to suffer.
“The payments will be helpful to farmers facing overdue loans and
angry bankers, but are completely insufficient if they mean that
tariffs and the trade war will last for the foreseeable future,"
Hurst said. "They are a very temporary bandage to a self-inflicted
wound.”
Some members of Trump's own party agreed.
"Tariffs are taxes that punish American consumers and producers,"
Kentucky Republican Senator Rand Paul wrote on Twitter "If
tariffs punish farmers, the answer is not welfare for farmers — the
answer is remove the tariffs."
Kevin Cramer, a U.S. representative trying to unseat Democrat
Senator Heidi Heitkamp in North Dakota, praised the move.
"Great to see @POTUS (Trump) providing aid to farmers impacted by
retaliatory #tariffs," Cramer wrote on Twitter
Later this week, Trump will visit Iowa and Illinois, two other
farm-belt states, as he seeks to shore up support for Republican
candidates in the U.S. Midwest.
(Reporting by David Shepardson in Washington and Steve Holland in
Kansas City; Additional reporting by Ginger Gibson, Susan Heavey and
Roberta Rampton in Washington; Michael Hirtzer, Thomas Polansek,
Caroline Stauffer and Mark Weinraub in Chicago; Writing by Susan
Heavey and James Oliphant; Editing by Marguerita Choy, Frances Kerry
and Lisa Shumaker)
[© 2018 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
Copyright 2018 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |