Airlines take aim at Australia's airport privatization
model
Send a link to a friend
[June 01, 2018]
By Jamie Freed
SYDNEY (Reuters) - As more countries look
to privatize airports two conflicting narratives have taken wing:
airlines point to Australia's big city airports as a cautionary tale of
light regulation, while airports say they've found a winning formula for
governments, investors and passengers.
Two decades after airports in Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane and Perth were
sold to pension funds and infrastructure investors, they are reporting
the highest margins in the world, data from trade group Airlines for
Australia & New Zealand (A4ANZ) shows.
A key factor - and one the airlines are trying to change - is that the
government cannot regulate fees or even intervene in disputes over them.
Ahead of an Australian government review later this year, airlines are
using the International Air Transport Association (IATA) annual meeting,
which starts on Sunday in Sydney, as a platform to loudly argue for new
rules that could lower their costs, kicking off a furious industry
debate.
"It isn't wrong to say there needs to be some kind of oversight that
ensures that the behavior of the service provider and the service
receiver, if you will, act in an appropriate manner," John Borghetti,
chief executive of Australia's second-biggest airline, Virgin Australia
Holdings Ltd <VAH.AX>, told Reuters.
Airport take-off and landing charges have risen 26 percent in real terms
over the last decade to as much as A$18.30 ($13.81) per passenger,
according to a report the Australian competition regulator released in
April.
A4ANZ says ticket prices have fallen by 40 percent during the same
period, shifting profits from airlines to airport operators and making
it difficult to cut fares further.
The Australian rules, which maximized what the government could get
upfront from selling the airports, are more extreme than that in other
regions with large privatized airports like Europe.
The system is raising concerns among airlines that other countries
looking to privatize airports, such as Japan, India and Vietnam, could
use Australia as a model.
"We must find an effective regulatory solution to ensure that Australia
is well served with competitive infrastructure," IATA CEO Alexandre de
Juniac told reporters on Thursday.
[to top of second column] |
Airport operators, however, say Australia is a success story, with more than
A$11.5 billion ($8.68 billion) of capital invested over the last decade,
allowing for world-class facilities with cutting-edge automated and biometric
technology.
Sydney Airport Holdings Pty Ltd <SYD.AX> CEO Geoff Culbert said Australia's
biggest airport is investing more than A$1 million a day to improve capacity,
services and facilities.
"This is all privately funded and comes at no cost to the taxpayer," he said.
What airlines really want, said Airports Council International (ACI) Director
General Angela Gittens, is a return to lower fees, in the days when airports
were government-owned, had less sophisticated management teams and suffered from
overcrowded infrastructure.
"That is a time that has passed," she said. "Governments have found that under
the right circumstances they can get private investment. They don't have to
decide whether I'm going to spend money on an airport versus spending money on a
hospital versus spending money on education."
ACI data shows that airport charges typically make up only 5 percent of airline
operating costs and that lower fees are not usually reflected in ticket prices.
The light-handed Australian privatization model, criticized by the country's
competition regulator, is just as polarizing for industry experts as it is with
airports and airlines.
"Because it is a highly regulated industry there must always be some
parameters," said Priveen Raj Naidu, CEO of Singapore-based consultancy Reapra
Aviation Partners, which has airport and government clients in Nepal, Myanmar,
India and Vietnam. "In Australia it was a free for all. There is no baseline.
This is where the government needs to get involved."
CAPA Center for Aviation Executive Chairman Peter Harbison said it was natural
for the airlines to argue hard for more regulation in Australia given it is in
their interest to reduce fees.
"We have got some of the best infrastructure in the world I think in Australia
largely because of the privatization," he said. "Is it cheap and lowest cost?
Very much no."
($1 = 1.3256 Australian dollars)
(Reporting by Jamie Freed; Editing by Gerry Doyle)
[© 2018 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2018 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |