The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Pasadena, California
ruled 3-0 that the nephew of the late composer Baligh Hamdy did
not have legal standing to pursue copyright claims over his
uncle's 1957 song "Khosara Khosara."
Circuit Judge Carlos Bea said the nephew, Osama Ahmed Fahmy,
could not sue Jay-Z and hip-hop producer Timbaland solely
because Egyptian law recognized an "inalienable moral right" of
authors to object to improper uses of copyrighted works.
Keith Wesley, a lawyer for Fahmy, did not immediately respond to
requests for comment.
Jay-Z and Timbaland, whose given names are Shawn Carter and
Timothy Mosley, had at first thought "Khosara" was in the public
domain, but in 2000 Timbaland paid EMI Music Arabia $100,000 for
song rights after that publisher objected.
Fahmy became aware of "Big Pimpin'" around that time, and sued
in 2007, claiming he retained some rights to "Khosara."
Famous music artists are often the target of lawsuits claiming
they copied earlier songs without permission.
Bea, however, said U.S. courts cannot enforce Fahmy's moral
rights to the song, while Egyptian law lets people like Jay-Z
and Timbaland pay for the right to adapt songs.
"Even in Egypt, Fahmy's moral rights would be insufficient to
win him anything but an injunction," Bea added.
[to top of second column] |
The decision upheld an October 2015 ruling by U.S. District Judge
Christina Snyder in Los Angeles.
That ruling followed a trial where Jay-Z testified that acquiring
song rights was not his responsibility.
The defendants also included Vivendi SA's UMG Recordings, Viacom
Inc's MTV Networks, Roc-a-Fella Records, and many others.
"This is a seminal decision from this circuit on moral rights,"
Christine Lepera, a lawyer for the defendants, said in an email.
"The plaintiff did not have economic rights in the allegedly
infringed 'Khosara' composition, and thus no right to sue for
infringement."
"Big Pimpin'" was a single from Jay-Z's 1999 album "Vol. 3: Life and
Times of S. Carter."
The case is Fahmy v Jay-Z et al, 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals,
No. 16-55213.
(Reporting by Jonathan Stempel in New York; Editing by Richard
Chang)
[© 2018 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2018 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content.
|