Texas high court rules state must reveal
supplier of execution drugs
Send a link to a friend
[June 02, 2018]
By Jon Herskovitz
AUSTIN, Texas (Reuters) - Texas must reveal
the source of the drugs it uses for executions, its Supreme Court
affirmed on Friday, rejecting the state's arguments that doing so could
lead to physical harm of the supplier and impede lethal injections.
Ever since a sales ban of lethal injection drugs by major pharmaceutical
companies a few years ago, most states have kept the suppliers of their
drugs secret. This has prompted lawsuits on behalf of death row inmates,
arguing that prisoners could be subjected to unconstitutional suffering
from faulty drugs in lethal injection mixes from questionable suppliers.
The Texas Supreme Court on Friday affirmed a May 2017 decision by an
appellate court that said there was not enough compelling evidence
provided by the state to show that there was a substantial threat of
physical harm.
"Today’s decision is a win for the fundamental principles of
transparency and open government,” Maurie Levin, one of the attorneys
who helped bring the lawsuit on behalf of two Texas death row inmates,
said in a statement.
The Texas Department of Criminal Justice said in a statement that it
intends to file a motion with the court for a rehearing.
Texas has executed 551 people since capital punishment was reinstated in
1976, 37 percent of all U.S. executions and more than triple any other
state, according to the Death Penalty Information Center.
Texas has also been one of the few states in the country able to procure
a steady supply of execution drugs.
[to top of second column]
|
The death chamber and the steel bars of the viewing room are seen at
the state penitentiary in Huntsville, Texas, U.S. on September 29,
2010. Courtesy Jenevieve Robbins/Texas Department of Criminal
Justice/Handout via REUTERS/File photo
In 2016, pharmaceutical company Pfizer Inc <PFE.N> joined a sales
ban imposed years earlier by major European drug makers that did not
want their products used in executions due to ethical concerns. This
caused many states to scramble for suppliers and a few to suspend
executions due to lack of drugs.
Although 31 states have the death penalty, only eight have held
executions since Pfizer's decision, which cut off the last major
U.S. source for drugs in the lethal mixtures.
Many have turned to lightly regulated compounding pharmacies, which
can mix chemicals. The states also have banned the release of the
pharmacies' names, which they have said was a security precaution.
For its lethal injection, Texas uses the barbiturate pentobarbital.
(Reporting by Jon Herskovitz; Editing by Toni Reinhold)
[© 2018 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
Copyright 2018 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content.
|