AT&T, Justice Department await decision that could
determine future of media
Send a link to a friend
[June 12, 2018]
By Diane Bartz
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - AT&T Inc, which owns
DirecTV, awaits a court ruling on Tuesday that will determine if it can
buy Time Warner Inc, a decision that could prompt a cascade of pay TV
companies buying television and movie makers and the first big test of
the Trump administration's antitrust teams.
Judge Richard Leon of the U.S. District Court for the District of
Columbia is expected to rule at 4 p.m. ET (2000 GMT) on whether the $85
billion deal may go forward more than 1-1/2 years after it was
announced.
The government argued in a six-week trial this spring that AT&T's
ownership of DirecTV, which has 20 million subscribers, would become too
powerful if combined with Time Warner, which owns Turner's sports and
CNN news. That power would allow the company to raise prices for pay TV
rivals and online streaming services, the government said.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8b040/8b040d06b2d5ee84bb75620a99be98bf5b026c42" alt=""
AT&T said the deal was legal, and pre-emptively offered to take any
disputes with pay TV rivals to arbitration while refraining from
withholding content, or "going dark", during the arbitration.
If AT&T wins, the Justice Department may rethink whether to sue to stop
other deals where a company buys a supplier, known as a "vertical
merger."
"It depends on the scope of the ruling. If it's narrow, like 'I don't
think Time Warner content is that must-have,' that may have implications
in a similar merger in the telecommunications space but may not have a
drastic effect in other vertical mergers," said Caroline Holland, who
was in the Antitrust Division during the administration of former
President Barack Obama.
A big win for the Justice Department would send shudders down the spines
of M&A bankers pursuing deals where a company seeks to merge with a
supplier.
[to top of second column] |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9b559/9b5597e5f2cacb6f366813538cb5c95a637ec795" alt=""
A combination photo shows the Time Warner shares price at the New
York Stock Exchange and AT&T logo in New York, NY, U.S., on November
15, 2017 and on October 23, 2016 respectively. REUTERS/Lucas Jackson
(L) and REUTERS/Stephanie Keith/File Photos
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2e4ce/2e4ced8936db929941a3d02ebd682522d102995a" alt=""
Already one deal depends on the ruling: Comcast Corp said in May that it was
preparing a higher, all-cash offer for most of the media assets of Twenty-First
Century Fox, but sources say it will only proceed if AT&T wins its case.
Two other vertical deals under review are Cigna Corp's plan to buy Express
Scripts Holding Co for $52 billion and CVS Health Corp's planned merger with
Aetna Inc for $69 billion.
Ahead of the court ruling, a top antitrust official at the Justice Department
urged investors not to read too much into the decision to sue to stop AT&T from
buying Time Warner.
Most proposed transactions were either good for consumers or neutral, said Makan
Delrahim, the assistant attorney general for antitrust.
"I understand that some journalists and observers have recently expressed
concern that the antitrust division no longer believes that vertical mergers can
be efficient and beneficial to competition and consumers," he said. "Rest
assured these concerns are misplaced."
(Reporting by Diane Bartz; Editing by Lisa Shumaker)
[© 2018 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2018 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3b9c5/3b9c503b60cf590cd6e883e51c0d31d15574b9a1" alt="" |